You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Validity of self-reported eye disease and treatment: is that correct?!
  1. Siamak Sabour1,
  2. Fariba Ghassemi2
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2Farabi Hospital, Eye Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  1. Correspondence to Professor Siamak Sabour, Department of Epidemiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; s.sabour{at}sbmu.ac.ir

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302205

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We were interested to read the paper by Patty and colleagues1 published in the April 2012 issue of Ophthalmology. The authors aimed to examine the validity of self-reported eye disease, including cataract, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy, and self-reported surgical treatment for cataract and diabetic retinopathy in the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. They report that the sensitivity …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.