Skip to main content
Subscribe
Log In
More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via AAO
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
Basket
Search
More
Search for this keyword
Advanced search
Latest content
Current issue
Archive
Browse by collection
Authors
About
Search for this keyword
Advanced search
Close
More
Main menu
Latest content
Current issue
Archive
Browse by collection
Authors
About
Subscribe
Log in
More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via AAO
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
BMJ Journals
You are here
Home
Archive
Volume 99, Issue 2
A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Email alerts
Article metrics
Article menu
Article
Text
Article
info
Citation
Tools
Share
Rapid Responses
Article
metrics
Alerts
PDF
Clinical science
A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Online download statistics by month:
Online download statistics by month: September 2014 to September 2024
Abstract
Full
Pdf
Sep 2014
214
10
29
Oct 2014
21
6
10
Nov 2014
31
5
7
Dec 2014
16
7
14
Jan 2015
312
16
36
Feb 2015
438
15
49
Mar 2015
335
10
35
Apr 2015
121
11
17
May 2015
109
2
12
Jun 2015
66
6
14
Jul 2015
60
6
10
Aug 2015
57
6
14
Sep 2015
62
3
11
Oct 2015
58
6
16
Nov 2015
66
5
8
Dec 2015
70
2
11
Jan 2016
53
4
11
Feb 2016
28
1
1
Mar 2016
26
3
7
Apr 2016
16
2
5
May 2016
41
3
5
Jun 2016
12
0
0
Jul 2016
18
1
3
Aug 2016
29
1
3
Sep 2016
25
5
6
Oct 2016
36
3
5
Nov 2016
22
0
1
Dec 2016
22
1
3
Jan 2017
20
0
4
Feb 2017
21
1
1
Mar 2017
18
2
1
Apr 2017
20
5
3
May 2017
32
10
6
Jun 2017
51
5
1
Jul 2017
89
3
3
Aug 2017
94
4
1
Sep 2017
175
3
1
Oct 2017
333
0
1
Nov 2017
145
15
3
Dec 2017
94
24
1
Jan 2018
92
20
3
Feb 2018
90
16
2
Mar 2018
105
17
2
Apr 2018
66
17
4
May 2018
68
10
1
Jun 2018
60
13
0
Jul 2018
67
23
0
Aug 2018
79
19
2
Sep 2018
79
22
2
Oct 2018
61
12
1
Nov 2018
63
12
0
Dec 2018
45
15
0
Jan 2019
59
16
2
Feb 2019
69
13
1
Mar 2019
54
2
2
Apr 2019
44
0
0
May 2019
23
5
1
Jun 2019
38
10
0
Jul 2019
57
10
3
Aug 2019
50
12
2
Sep 2019
46
10
1
Oct 2019
37
9
0
Nov 2019
44
11
0
Dec 2019
58
16
1
Jan 2020
36
10
0
Feb 2020
47
13
3
Mar 2020
48
16
3
Apr 2020
32
15
1
May 2020
38
19
1
Jun 2020
28
16
4
Jul 2020
42
12
0
Aug 2020
75
10
0
Sep 2020
71
18
3
Oct 2020
41
13
2
Nov 2020
34
2
1
Dec 2020
76
1
0
Jan 2021
50
2
6
Feb 2021
48
0
5
Mar 2021
26
0
1
Apr 2021
30
0
0
May 2021
7
2
0
Aug 2021
1
0
1
Sep 2021
0
0
1
Oct 2021
20
5
3
Nov 2021
18
2
0
Dec 2021
15
1
1
Jan 2022
24
0
0
Feb 2022
32
4
3
Mar 2022
26
0
1
Apr 2022
35
0
3
May 2022
48
3
1
Jun 2022
47
3
2
Jul 2022
48
7
2
Aug 2022
52
3
3
Sep 2022
60
1
3
Oct 2022
57
2
2
Nov 2022
18
0
0
Dec 2022
18
2
2
Jan 2023
25
1
1
Feb 2023
96
0
0
Mar 2023
15
1
0
Apr 2023
16
0
0
May 2023
39
2
1
Jun 2023
4
0
0
Jul 2023
22
2
0
Aug 2023
12
0
0
Sep 2023
32
0
0
Oct 2023
12
0
0
Nov 2023
57
4
0
Dec 2023
44
2
1
Jan 2024
26
2
2
Feb 2024
9
1
1
Mar 2024
37
4
2
Apr 2024
46
3
2
May 2024
48
4
1
Jun 2024
34
1
1
Jul 2024
35
1
1
Aug 2024
28
0
0
Sep 2024
34
4
3
Total
6829
736
473
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe
Log in
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via AAO
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
PDF