You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Scientific correspondence
A comparative study of proxymetacaine-fluorescein and lignocaine-fluorescein use during applanation tonometry
  1. Wayne Birchalla,
  2. Vineeth Kumarb
  1. aRoyal Eye Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WH, UK, bStepping Hill Hospital, Poplar Grove, Stockport SK2 9JE, UK
  1. Mr Birchallwaynebirchall{at}yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

AIMS To evaluate the relative merits of proxymetacaine-fluorescein (PROX-FLU) and lignocaine-fluorescein (LIG-FLU) when used to perform applanation tonometry.

METHODS This prospective, masked, double blind study assessed several aspects of the tonometry process—the duration of the stinging sensation and degree of discomfort, the extent of reflex lacrimation induced, the need for subsequent tear film manipulation to ensure an accurate tonometry reading, and total time to complete tonometry—for each preparation.

RESULTS PROX-FLU caused significantly less discomfort and reflex lacrimation than LIG-FLU and accurate tonometry was more rapidly completed when it was used. PROX-FLU was preferred by 98% of the study patients.

CONCLUSION PROX-FLU is a well tolerated and useful alternative to the more widely used LIG-FLU mixture.

  • proxymetacaine
  • fluorescein
  • lignocaine
  • applanation tonometry

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.4.477

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes