You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with anterior chamber intraocular lenses

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with anterior chamber intraocular lenses
  1. Donald Tan1,2,3,
  2. Hla M Htoon2,
  3. Marcus Ang1,2
  1. 1Cornea Service and Refractive Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  2. 2Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
  1. Correspondence to Professor Donald Tan, Cornea Service and Refractive Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Drive, Singapore 168751, Singapore; donald.tan.t.h{at}snec.com.sg

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305810

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Dear Editor,

    We thank Mittal and Garg for their interest in our publication. Our study analysed Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with anterior chamber intraocular lenses (ACIOL) with regards to 3-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss as our main outcome measures, not visual outcome or complications.1 Here, we used Kaplan–Meier survival analysis that takes into account any censored data from loss to follow-up, to derive that there was a significantly poorer graft survival in the DSAEK-ACIOL group versus the DSAEK group (log-rank p=0.002). In fact, completely excluding subjects …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors All authors contributed significantly to the preparation of this manuscript.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Patient consent Obtained.

    • Ethics approval Singhealth Centralised Institutional Review Board.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles