Purpose To determine the relationship between iris surface features and acute primary angle closure (APAC) in eyes with angle closure.
Design Case-control study involving Asian patients diagnosed with previous APAC, primary angle closure suspect (PACS), primary angle closure (PAC) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) at an eye centre in Singapore between August 2012 and January 2015.
Methods Participants underwent ophthalmic examination and digital slit-lamp iris photography. Iris surface features were graded based on crypts, furrows and colour. Fellow eyes of APAC were compared with PACS and PAC/PACG eyes with regard to their iris surface features.
Main outcome measure Occurrence of APAC.
Results A total of 309 patients (71 APAC, 139 PACS, 47 PAC and 52 PACG) were included (mean age: 67.7±7.2 years and 36.6% male). Compared with PACS, higher crypt grade was significantly associated with lower odds of APAC (OR=0.58 for one grade higher in crypt grade; p=0.027, adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and pupil diameter). The results remained similar when compared with PAC/PACG group (OR=0.58 for one grade higher in crypt grade; p=0.043). We did not observe any significant associations between iris furrows or colour with presence of APAC.
Conclusions Our study comprising Asian eyes with angle closure suggests that the presence of a higher crypt grading may be protective for APAC. As such, assessing iris surface architecture for crypts could be a new measure for risk stratification of developing APAC in eyes with angle closure.
- Diagnostic tests/Investigation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. The sentence “KV and CJ contributed equally.” has been added to the Contributorship statement.
Contributors VK, JC and C-YC had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: C-YC and TA. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: VK, JC and C-YC. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Statistical analysis: YS and JC. Obtained funding: C-YC. Administrative, technical or material support: all authors. Study supervision: C-YC. VK, JC, YS, SGT, MEN, MB, RSK, SP, TA and C-YC prepared and reviewed the main manuscript, tables and figures. KV and CJ contributed equally.
Funding The study is funded by National Medical Research Council (NIG/1069/2012 and CIRG/1442/2016), Singapore. C-YC is supported by National Medical Research Council (CSA/033/2012).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.