Responses

PDF
Optic nerve head cupping in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Optic nerve head analysis to rule out glaucoma
    • Sagnik Sen, Ophthalmologist AIIMS, New Delhi, India
    • Other Contributors:
      • Rebika Dhiman, Ophthalmologist

    Dear authors,

    We congratulate the authors for bringing out an ingenious theory regarding pathogenesis of cupping in glaucomatous (GC) and non-glaucomatous (NGC) eyes using this optical coherence tomography (OCT) model. (1) Differentiating a NGC from GC has been a point of discussion for decades and to finally have an objective parameter “anterior laminar depth (ALD)” which appears specific for glaucomatous cupping from this study is indeed beneficial. The authors have used a linear regression model to compare the GC and NGC eyes with healthy controls with adjustment of age, axial length and peripapillary choroidal thickness (PCT). However, it remains to be further studied, how the ALD is to be used for an individual patient, for eg., what cut-off of ALD above which a patient can be labelled as falling in the glaucomatous range. In this regard, we had a doubt regarding inclusion of PCT in ALD calculation. Since the authors have finally adjusted for PCT in the end, we wonder how the results will turn out if they would remove PCT from ALD measurement and compare the remainder measurement (ALD - PCT) between NGC and GC groups.
    Finally, we observed that in this sentence “No significant difference was found in visual field mean deviation (MD) <0.001).”, there is a typographical error and an inadequacy of explanation. No significant difference in visual field MD was indeed seen between NGC and GC groups (p should be >0.99 and not <0.001, as seen in Table...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.