Article Text

Worldwide outcomes of nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle for strabismus associated with 3rd-nerve palsy
  1. Ankoor S Shah1,2,
  2. Mary-Magdalene Ugo Dodd1,2,
  3. Birsen Gokyigit3,
  4. Birgit Lorenz4,
  5. Erick Laurent5,
  6. Mohammad Ali Ayaz Sadiq6,7,
  7. Chong-Bin Tsai8,
  8. Nicolas Gravier9,
  9. Mitra Goberville10,
  10. Sotirios Basiakos11,12,
  11. David Zurakowski13,
  12. Linda R Dagi1,2
  13. for the NTSLR3NP Study Group
    1. 1 Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    2. 2 Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    3. 3 Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Prof Dr N Reşat Belger Beyoglu Education and Research Eye Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
    4. 4 Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Gießen, Germany
    5. 5 Centre d'Ophtalmologie du Lez, Clinique St Jean, Montpellier, France
    6. 6 Institute of Ophthalmology, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
    7. 7 Institute of Ophthalmology, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
    8. 8 Ophthalmology, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
    9. 9 Unité de Strabologie-Polyclinique de l'Atlantique, Nantes-Saint-Herblain Cedex, France
    10. 10 Centre Ophtalmologique Lauriston, Paris, France
    11. 11 Ophthalmology, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
    12. 12 Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
    13. 13 Anesthesia, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    1. Correspondence to Dr Linda R Dagi, Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; linda.dagi{at}childrens.harvard.edu

    Abstract

    Background/aims To determine success rate and complications associated with nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle (NTSLR) for treating strabismus from 3rd-nerve palsy.

    Methods An international, multicentre, registry of patients with unilateral 3rd-nerve palsy treated with NTSLR was created. Patients with concurrent surgery on the contralateral eye were excluded. Primary outcome was horizontal alignment within 15 prism dioptres (PD) of orthotropia. Incidence of technical difficulties and vision-threatening complications by 6 months post-procedure were reported.

    Results Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 33.5 years (IQR 10.75–46). Aetiologies included congenital (31%), neoplastic (16%) and traumatic (15%). Twenty-five per cent of patients had prior ipsilateral strabismus surgery. Median exotropia decreased from 70PD preoperatively (IQR 50–90) to 1PD postoperatively (IQR 0–15.5), with a success rate of 69%. Performing concurrent superior oblique muscle tenotomy (SOT) was independently associated with success (p=0.001). Technical challenges occurred in 30% of cases, independently associated with a history of ipsilateral strabismus surgery (p=0.01). Eleven per cent of patients had vision-threatening complications, independently associated with more posterior placement of the split lateral rectus (LR) muscle (p<0.001), and most commonly transient serous choroidal effusion. Surgical placement of the split LR muscle within 4.25 mm of the medial rectus (MR) muscle insertion reduced this risk.

    Conclusion NTSLR significantly improved primary position alignment altered by 3rd-nerve palsy. Concurrent SOT and placement of the split LR muscle ≤4.25 mm posterior to the MR muscle insertion optimised outcomes. NTSLR proved technically challenging when prior ipsilateral strabismus surgery had been performed.

    • muscles
    • treatment surgery

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Deidentified participant data are stored in a RedCAP registry administered by Boston Children’s Hospital and available from LRD, MD (linda.dagi@childrens.harvard.edu).

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Treating the complex, incomitant, strabismus associated with complete 3rd-nerve palsy poses a challenge. Numerous surgical options have been described to address the associated exotropia such as medial rectus (MR) muscle resection combined with lateral rectus (LR) muscle recession, disinsertion and anchoring of the LR muscle to the lateral orbital wall,1 or LR muscle myectomy2 or extirpation.3 Results of anchoring the globe to the periosteum along the medial orbital wall4–6 and transposition of the superior oblique muscle tendon to the superior border of the MR muscle have been detailed as well.7 8

    Taylor introduced the novel concept of reducing exotropia in 3rd-nerve palsy by transposition of the LR muscle to the nasal side of the globe.9 Kaufmann reported a modification wherein the LR muscle was split into superior and inferior halves with medial transposition of each half close to the superior and inferior vortex veins.10 Gokyigit et al introduced a new technique transposing the split halves of the LR muscle close to the MR muscle insertion.11 Shah et al added adjustable sutures to enable more precise ocular alignment.12 Saxena and colleagues augmented the impact with placement of posterior fixation sutures.13 Basiakos et al published the largest cohort of patients confirming efficacy of nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle (NTSLR).14 However, technical challenges and vision threatening complications have been noted.12 14–18

    Given the numerous single-centre studies reporting varying degrees of success with NTSLR, the rarity of 3rd-nerve palsy, and the possibility of vision threatening complications, we disseminated a cloud-based registry internationally to improve our understanding of outcomes and risks associated with NTSLR.

    Material and methods

    This multi-centre, retrospective, non-randomised, cohort study was initiated at Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    Data collection

    A research electronic data capture (REDCap) registry was designed. Invitation to participate was announced through paediatric ophthalmology electronic mailing lists, a WhatsApp group of Indian paediatric ophthalmologists, the European Strabismological Association, and presentation at the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Annual Meeting in 2018. The registry opened in August 2017 and closed in June 2018.

    This registry prompted entry of demographic data including aetiology of the 3rd-nerve palsy, laterality, sex, age at diagnosis, age at surgery, surgeon and history of strabismus surgery. Examination data included best-corrected visual acuity, sensorimotor examination evaluation before and after NTSLR, all variations in surgical technique, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

    Demographic inclusion/exclusion criteria

    All patients with unilateral 3rd-nerve palsy and completed REDCap data entry through 6 months postprocedure were included. Patients treated for bilateral 3rd-nerve palsy or unilateral 3rd-nerve palsy with NTSLR augmented by concurrent surgery on the contralateral eye were excluded.

    Sensorimotor examination

    Horizontal alignment at 1/3 m was noted in prism dioptres (PD). If alignment at 1/3 m was not available, alignment at 3 m was substituted. Both preoperative and postoperative horizontal alignment was measured by simultaneous prism and cover testing (SPCT) while fixating with the non-paretic eye in primary position or estimated by Krimsky method if an SPCT measurement was unavailable. Vertical alignment at 1/3 metre was noted in PD with preference for SPCT, then Krimsky, or finally alternate prism and cover test fixating with the non-paretic eye. Fusion was queried as a binary variable indicating any evidence of binocular vision including appropriate compensatory head posture, motor fusion, sensory fusion on Worth-4-dot testing, or stereopsis.

    Details pertaining to surgery

    The distance from the superior or inferior border of the MR muscle insertion for each half of the nasally transposed LR muscle was reported in mm. Zero millimetre was designated for transposition to the MR muscle insertion with a positive value denoting a location posterior to the MR muscle insertion. The mean of the reported distance of the superior and inferior halves of the nasally transposed LR muscle from the MR muscle insertion was used to study the impact of transposition location on postoperative horizontal alignment, change in horizontal alignment, and technical and vision-threatening complications. Surgical modifications specifically queried included concurrent superior oblique muscle tenotomy (SOT), inferior oblique muscle (IO) myectomy, adjustable suture technique or augmentation suture(s).

    Technical difficulties encountered during this surgery such as partial muscle rupture or inability to adequately transpose the split LR muscle segments were analysed as ‘technical difficulties’. Any reduction in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity or postoperative examination findings that might threaten vision such as altered chorioretinal or anterior segment circulation, or optic nerve function, were included in the analysis under ‘vision-threatening complications’.

    Outcomes

    The primary outcome was successful postoperative horizontal alignment within 15PD of orthotropia.19 Impact of the aetiology, age at surgery, surgeon, magnitude of preoperative exotropia, mean location of the transposed halves of the LR muscle, and concurrent SOT or IO myectomy were queried by univariate and multivariable analysis with respect to success. Secondary outcome measures were (i) incidence of technical difficulties, (ii) incidence of vision-threatening complications and (iii) factors associated with postoperative fusion. Baseline and intraoperative factors were queried by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses with respect to these outcomes.

    Statistical analyses

    Raw data from the REDCap database were exported to Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) and filtered to include cases based on the criteria noted. Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics V.27.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous data were summarised using medians and IQRs and were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Binary variables were compared by Pearson χ2 test and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Univariate analysis identified variables showing significant differences and relevant variables were subject to multivariable logistic regression analyses. Multiple linear regression analysis with backward selection was used to understand factors that might predict the magnitude of correction afforded by NTSLR. Related-samples Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative alignment. Comparisons with p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. A receiver-operating characteristic for vision threatening complications was planned to establish thresholds.

    Results

    Demographics

    Thirty-six surgeons in North America, South America, Europe, Middle East or Asia entered 146 cases of NTSLR into the REDCap registry. One hundred and thirty-four entries were complete and 98 met inclusion criteria (online supplemental eFigure 1) with demographic characteristics shown in table 1. The median age at surgery was 33.5 years (IQR 10.75–46). Forty-eight per cent of patients were female, 48% of cases involved the right eye and 25% of cases had a history of ipsilateral strabismus surgery. The most common aetiologies were congenital (31%), neoplastic (16%) and traumatic (15%). The median preoperative exotropia was 70PD (IQR 50–90). The median preoperative hypotropia was 4PD (IQR 10–0).

    Table 1

    Demographic data of patients who underwent nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle for strabismus from unilateral 3rd-nerve palsy

    Surgical details

    Ninety-eight unilateral NTSLR surgeries were completed with median placement of the superior and inferior split ends of the LR muscle 0 mm (IQR 0–4.5) posterior to the insertion of the MR muscle. Eighty-eight patients underwent NTSLR surgery with common concurrent variations: IO myectomy (n=7), SOT (n=16), adjustable sutures (n=17) or augmentation sutures (n=4). Ten patients underwent NTSLR surgery plus other ipsilateral horizontal eye alignment surgery such as MR muscle tuck or resection, superior oblique muscle transposition nasally and inferiorly, or fascia lata lengthening of the LR muscle (online supplemental eFigure 1 bottom row, online supplemental eTable 1). Table 2 outlines the surgical details of each population.

    Table 2

    Surgical details of patients undergoing unilateral nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle for strabismus associated with 3rd-nerve palsy

    Success

    NTSLR surgery was successful in 69% (68/98) of cases (figure 1, online supplemental eTable 2). The subset treated by NTSLR surgery without additional ipsilateral horizontal surgery was successful in 67% (59/88), and the subset treated by NTSLR surgery augmented by other ipsilateral horizontal alignment surgery was successful in 80% (8/10).

    Figure 1

    Success of the nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle (NTSLR) in correcting strabismus associated with unilateral 3rd-nerve palsy for all cases and for the subsets of NTSLR surgery: NTSLR surgery (without superior oblique muscle tenotomy (SOT)), NTSLR surgery with SOT and NTSLR plus other ipsilateral, horizontal eye muscle surgery. Success is defined as a postoperative horizontal eye alignment within 15 prism dioptres of orthotropia within 6 months of surgery. The bars denote the 95% CI. Note that patients who had NTSLR surgery, both with and without SOT, belong to the cohort of 88 patients, who had no additional horizontal surgery.

    To isolate the effect of NTSLR surgery, motor outcomes were calculated on the subset of 88 patients without additional horizontal surgery (median preoperative exotropia 65PD (IQR 50–90)). The median postoperative alignment was 0PD of exotropia (IQR 0–18) with a median reduction of exotropia of 60PD (IQR 45.5–80). The median postoperative hypotropia was 1.5PD (IQR 0–7). Eighty-three per cent of patients expressed satisfaction with their postoperative eye alignment (73/87, 1 entry did not report patient satisfaction).

    By univariate analysis, surgeon (p=0.06), age at surgery (p=0.87), sex (p=0.60), history of strabismus surgery on the ipsilateral eye (p=0.07), aetiology (p=0.09), concurrent IO myectomy (p=0.09), mean placement of the NTSLR muscle relative to the MR muscle (p=0.07), use of an adjustable suture technique (p=0.73) and use of augmentation sutures (p=0.73) did not impact success. Univariate analysis showed an association of success with concurrent SOT (p=0.002) and magnitude of preoperative exotropia (p=0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that concurrent SOT was independent of history of strabismus surgery, magnitude of the preoperative exotropia and mean placement of the split LR muscle (p=0.001). All 16 patients (100%) who underwent concurrent SOT had a successful outcome, while 43 of the 72 patients (60%) without concurrent SOT had a successful outcome (p<0.001).

    Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the magnitude of exotropia correction afforded by NTSLR surgery was dependent on the preoperative deviation (R2=0.75) meaning that greater correction was obtained in patients with larger preoperative exotropia. This characteristic was demonstrated to be independent of history of strabismus surgery, mean placement of the split LR muscle and SOT (p<0.001) (figure 2).

    Figure 2

    Magnitude of reduction in exotropia afforded by nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle for 3rd-nerve palsy is dependent on the preoperative exotropia (p<0.001). PD, prism dioptres.

    Thirty-four per cent of patients (30/87) demonstrated postoperative binocular fusion (data unavailable in one case). Univariate analysis demonstrated that older age at diagnosis (p<0.001) and history of prior binocularity (p<0.001) were positively associated with postoperative binocular fusion whereas congenital aetiology of 3rd-nerve palsy and longer time between diagnosis and surgery (p=0.007) were negatively associated with postoperative fusion (p=0.003). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed an independent association of both longer time between diagnosis and surgery (OR 0.89, 95th percentile CI 0.81 to 0.97, p=0.01) and congenital aetiology (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.70, p=0.02) with absence of postoperative fusion (table 3). Sixteen per cent (14/88) demonstrated a postoperative head turn to maintain fusion.

    Table 3

    Demographic data of patients who underwent nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle for strabismus from unilateral 3rd-nerve palsy dichotomised by whether they achieved binocular vision

    Technical challenges

    Technical challenges completing NTSLR were encountered in 30% of the entire group (29/98, table 4). There were three cases where a split half of the LR muscle was pulled-in-two, one case of a difficult to transpose LR, one case where the inferior half of the LR muscle was too taut to transpose and one case where the transposed superior half of the LR muscle slipped off the suture. There were six other cases where difficulties with splitting were encountered. Comments included ‘it was very hard to do’, ‘I worried about globe compression’ and ‘I may have lost or torn a bit of muscle’. Technical challenges were unrelated to age at time of procedure (p=0.65), time from diagnosis to surgery (p=0.14), magnitude of preoperative exotropia (p=0.85), aetiology (p=0.10) and to the intraoperative manoeuvres including SOT (p=0.77) and IO myectomy (p=0.42) by univariate analysis. Technical challenges were associated with prior history of strabismus surgery (p=0.01) by univariate analysis; multivariable logistic regression analysis showed history of strabismus surgery to be independent of all preoperative and intra-operative factors (p=0.01).

    Table 4

    Technical difficulties and complications encountered intraoperatively and postoperatively with nasal transposition of the split lateral rectus muscle. Each technical difficulty is not mutually exclusive; each vision threatening is mutually exclusive

    Vision-threatening complications

    Vision-threatening complications were encountered in 11% of the entire group (11/98, table 4). Surgeons reported seven cases of serous choroidal effusion self-resolving over weeks to 2 months, one case of presumed anterior segment ischaemia (diagnosed by iris depigmentation), one case of transient ocular hypertension to 30 mm Hg relieved by anterior chamber paracentesis (this case also had a serous choroidal effusion) and three cases of mild vision decline of unknown cause. Vision-threatening complications were unrelated to age at time of surgery (p=0.77), time from diagnosis to surgery (p=0.58) and history of strabismus surgery (p=0.27) and to intraoperative manoeuvres including SOT (p=0.20) and IO myectomy (p=1.00) by univariate analysis. Vision-threatening complications were associated with greater magnitude of preoperative exotropia (p=0.004) and mean placement of the split LR muscle with respect to the MR muscle insertion (p<0.001) by univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only mean placement of the split LR muscle remained associated with vision-threatening complications (p<0.001). For those patients without vision-threatening complications, the median of the mean placement of the split LR muscle was 0 mm (IQR 0–2.5) posterior to the MR muscle insertion and for those with vision-threatening complications, the median of the mean placement of the split LR muscle was 10 mm (IQR 4.5–13) posterior to the MR muscle insertion. A receiver operating characteristic curve illustrated that mean placement of the split LR muscle within 4.25 mm of the MR muscle insertion minimised the risk of encountering a vision threatening complication (figure 3). Of the 11 patients with vision threatening complications, 5 returned to full preoperative visual acuity, 3 declined mildly (2 declined from 20/40 to 20/60 and 1 from 20/20 to 20/30) and 3 ‘recovered’ without specific acuity information available according to the investigator. Moreover, vision-threatening complications did not adversely affect the outcome of fusion (p=0.73).

    Figure 3

    Receiver operating characteristic curve showing the relationship of mean placement of the split lateral rectus (LR) muscle with respect to the insertion of the medial rectus (MR) muscle and the risk of vision threatening complication. Mean placement of the split LR muscle within 4.25 mm of the MR muscle insertion minimises the risk of encountering a vision threatening complication. The area under the curve is 0.83 with a 95% CI of 0.67 to 0.99.

    Discussion

    Third-nerve palsy is a rare disorder causing complex, incomitant ocular misalignment, intractable diplopia and social stigma. Most publications describing options for strabismus repair are single-centre case series of modest size.1–14 Although case series provide a critical forum for describing and critiquing a surgical approach,9–14 larger datasets are necessary to validate outcomes and risks associated with any procedure. We designed a REDCAP-based registry as the first large-scale, multicentre, international collaboration on the outcomes of any strabismus procedure for 3rd-nerve palsy.

    The definition of success was postoperative horizontal alignment within 15PD of orthophoria as Chan et al demonstrated that lay observers rarely identify exotropia until it exceeds 15PD.19 We found that 69% of patients had a successful outcome, and this increased to 100% if treated with concurrent SOT. Eighty-three per cent of patients were satisfied, and 1/3 of patients demonstrated binocular fusion. Predictably, achievement of binocular fusion was most likely in cases with non-congenital aetiology and a shorter time interval between diagnosis and surgery. These outcomes suggest that NTSLR surgery for correction of strabismus from 3rd-nerve palsy is a compelling option.

    Prior reports have documented a tendency towards under correction after NTSLR surgery in the presence of very large angles of preoperative exotropia.10 11 Gokyigit et al added MR muscle resection or contralateral LR muscle recession in such cases.11 Erbagci et al added MR resection for undercorrection.20 Sukhija et al required additional surgery in two of three patients with preoperative exotropia of 80–90PD.21 Saxena et al augmented NTSLR with fixation sutures 8 mm posterior to the MR muscle insertion to reduce residual exotropia in three cases.13 Ten patients in the current series had augmentative ipsilateral surgery as well.

    We have demonstrated, however, that the net reduction in exotropia from NTSLR correlates with the magnitude of the preoperative exotropia (figure 2). A larger angle of preoperative exotropia may be associated with a more taut LR muscle that, once transposed, will transmit greater adducting tone to the eye. In addition, it has been our experience that postoperative alignment under general anaesthesia is highly predictive of alignment postrecovery. We suggest completing NTSLR with concomitant SOT and checking alignment under anaesthesia before considering additional surgery.

    Our definition of successful alignment in the postoperative period did not address residual vertical misalignment. We found that the magnitude of preoperative and postoperative hypotropia was small with a median of 4PD before and 2PD after surgery, where a meaningful change in vertical alignment would be difficult to demonstrate. Finally, 16 patients had SOT and 7 had IO myectomy, both potentially altering vertical alignment.

    Technical challenges associated with performing NTSLR surgery occurred in 30% of cases. These challenges were associated with prior strabismus surgery. Prior LR muscle recession results in sarcomere shortening, and a shorter LR muscle is more technically difficult to split and to transpose. In addition, scar tissue from prior surgery might hinder transposition around the globe. Surgeons contemplating NTSLR surgery should have an alternative plan in cases with a history of ipsilateral strabismus surgery. Lengthening of the split LR muscle with fascia lata has proven successful at times.22

    Vision-threatening complications were present in 11% of the cohort. Serous choroidal effusion was the most common cause, with variable onset and duration. This was previously reported in 33% of 29 cases by Basiakos et al 14 and in single cases by Sorenson and Soni15 and Shah et al.12 Transposition of split LR halves that are too short (inadequately split), or excessively taut, may compromise retinochoroidal circulation23 24 just beneath the transposed segments or at adjacent vortex veins. It is notable that these effusions were associated with more posterior placement of the split ends of the LR muscle, on average, 10 mm posterior to the MR insertion. Transposition that is more posterior on the globe may have greater impact on posterior circulation and on the vortex veins. Transposition of the split ends closer to the MR muscle insertion, in contrast, may produce an anterior arc of contact with the globe, diminishing impact on posterior circulation.

    It is also possible that NTSLR may share characteristics associated with placement of a scleral buckle. Subretinal fluid that mimics central serious chorioretinopathy has been reported to occur after scleral buckle placement25 as has diminished retinochoroidal circulation23 and anterior segment ischaemia.26 Presumed anterior segment ischaemia was reported in one of our patients.

    Finally, it is also possible that small choroidal effusions were present in more cases than reported. Though not performed in our cohort, relaxing the transposition may treat choroidal effusion,27 but alter alignment as well.

    This study has limitations inherent in analysing data from 36 surgeons who may have varied in their approach to measuring, performing surgery and reporting outcomes in a retrospective manner. Since the same investigator would be reporting preoperative and postoperative alignment, we do not believe investigator-to-investigator differences had a significant impact on our results. Technical difficulties may have been under-reported as operative notes may not include difficulties that were overcome. Sensory outcomes are similarly limited because our registry asked surgeons to enter the presence or absence of fusion but not to grade binocularity or associated functional benefits. Torsion was also not queried. Finally, the presence of vision threatening complications may have been under-reported as postoperative funduscopic examinations were not standardised but should be considered.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Deidentified participant data are stored in a RedCAP registry administered by Boston Children’s Hospital and available from LRD, MD (linda.dagi@childrens.harvard.edu).

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained. This work complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of the USA and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All contributors obtained local IRB approval (or exemption). Boston Children's Hospital IRB-P00023775.

    References

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @MA_Sadiq

    • Presented at Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Annual Meeting, March 2018 (subset of data presented). Joint meeting of the European and International Strabismological Associations, April 2021

    • Collaborators NTSLR3NP Study Group: Sumita Agarkar (India), Francois Audren (France), Ana Luiza Costa (Brazil), Linda R Dagi (USA), Mary-Magdalene Ugo Dodd (USA), Jan Tjeerd de Faber (Netherlands), Amr Elkamshoushy (Egypt), Ronit Friling (Israel), Mitra Goberville (France), Birsen Gokyigit (Turkey), Michael Gräf (Germany), Nicolas Gravier (France), Mauro Goldchmit (Brazil), Gena Heidary (USA), David Hunter (USA), Laila Jeddawi (Saudi Arabia), Madhu Karna (India), Erick Laurent (France), Birgit Lorenz (Germany), Ningdong Li (China), Iason S Mantagos (USA), Pilar Merino-Sanz (Spain), Faruk Orge (USA), Sanket R Nirgude (India), Mohammad Ali Sadiq (Pakistan), Rohit Saxena (India), Ankoor S Shah (USA), Veeral Shah (USA), Pradeep Sharma (India), James Banks Shepherd (USA), Ajay Soni (USA), Claude Speeg-Schatz (France), Alain Spielmann (France), Mitchell Strominger (USA), Jaspreet Sukhija (India), Chong-Bin Tsai (Taiwan), Federico G Velez (USA), Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe (Israel).

    • Contributors ASS: conceptualisation, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing – original draft, visualisation. M-MUD: methodology, software, formal analysis, data curation, writing – original draft. BG: investigation, writing – review and editing. BL: investigation, writing – review and editing. EL: investigation, writing – review and editing. MAAS: investigation, writing – review and editing. C-BT: investigation, writing – review and editing. NG: investigation, writing – review and editing. MG: investigation, writing – review and editing. SB: investigation, writing – review and editing. DZ: methodology, formal analysis, visualisation. LRD: guarantor, conceptualisation, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft, visualisation, supervision, funding acquisition.

    • Funding Children’s Hospital Ophthalmology Foundation Chair funds held by senior author.

    • Competing interests ASS: Medtronic (Stock interest); Rebion (Royalties); Pfizer (Stock interest). LRD: honoraria for speaking at academic centres: Texas Children’s Hospital, Canadian Ophthalmological Society, UCSF Department of Ophthalmology, Kellogg Eye Center where early data were discussed, Pfizer (Stock interest).

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

    Linked Articles

    • Highlights from this issue
      Frank Larkin