Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Quantitative contrast sensitivity test to assess visual function in central serous chorioretinopathy
  1. Filippos Vingopoulos1,2,
  2. Itika Garg1,2,
  3. Esther Lee Kim1,2,
  4. Merina Thomas3,
  5. Rebecca F Silverman1,
  6. Megan Kasetty1,
  7. Zakariyya Y Hassan1,
  8. Gina Yu4,
  9. Katherine Joltikov4,
  10. Eun Young Choi1,
  11. Inês Laíns2,
  12. Leo A Kim2,
  13. David N Zacks4,
  14. John B Miller1,2
  1. 1Harvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
  2. 2Retina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  3. 3Retina DIvision, Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
  4. 4Ophthalmology, Kellogg Eye Center, Univerisy of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr John B Miller, Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114, USA; john_miller{at}meei.harvard.edu

Abstract

Background To characterise the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) compared with healthy controls using novel computerised contrast sensitivity (CS) testing with active learning algorithms.

Methods Prospective observational study measuring CSF in CSCR eyes and controls using the Manifold Platform (Adaptive Sensory Technology, San Diego, California). Mixed effects multivariate regression models were used. Outcomes included area under the log CSF (AULCSF), CS thresholds at 1, 1.5, 3, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Associations of contrast outcomes with structural findings on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and subjective symptomatology were investigated.

Results Forty CSCR eyes and 89 controls were included with median BCVA logarithm of median angle of resolution 0.10 (20/25) versus 0.00 (20/20), respectively (p=0.01). When accounting for age, CSCR was associated with significantly reduced median AULCSF (p=0.02, β=−0.14) and reduced CS thresholds at 6 cpd (p=0.009, β=−0.18), 12 cpd (p<0.001, β=−0.23) and 18 cpd (p=0.04, β=−0.09), versus controls. Within the CSCR group, subjectively perceived visual impairment (N=22) was associated with significantly decreased CS thresholds at all spatial frequencies and in AULCSF compared with asymptomatic CSCR eyes (N=18). Ellipsoid zone attenuation and subfoveal fluid on OCT were associated with decreased AULCSF and CS thresholds specifically at 3, 6 and 12 cpd, whereas presence of extrafoveal fluid at 1.5 and 3 cpd.

Conclusion Contrast sensitivity is significantly reduced in CSCR, and strongly correlates with subjective visual impairment. Different structural biomarkers correlate with contrast thresholds reductions at different spatial frequencies.

  • retina
  • visual perception
  • vision

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Not applicable.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. Not applicable.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @FVingopoulos, @itikagarg, @Ginayuknow

  • Presented at The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), Baltimore, Maryland, 7–11 May 2017; American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS), Boston, Massachusetts, 11–15 August 2017; Retina Society, Boston, Massachusetts, 5–8 October 2017.

  • Contributors Concept and Design: FV, ELK, MT, LK, DNZ, JBM. Data Collection: FV, ELK, MT, RFS, MK, ZYH, GY, KJ, EYC. Data Analysis: IG, IL. Original Manuscript Draft: FV, ELK, MT. Critical Revision of Manuscript: FV, IG, ELK, MT, RFS, MK, ZYH, GY, KJ, EYC, IL, LK, DNZ, JBM. Guarantors: FV, JBM

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.