Article Text
Abstract
Background/aims This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with active central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and foveal atrophy.
Methods Patients diagnosed with active idiopathic CSC using multimodal imaging and followed up for at least 6 months were included. They were divided into two groups (foveal atrophy group vs foveal non-atrophy group) according to a cut-off central foveal thickness of 120 µm on baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT). Baseline characteristics, angiographic and tomographic features and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results Of the 463 patients, 92 eyes of 92 patients (19.9%) were in the foveal atrophy group and 371 eyes of 371 patients (80.1%) were in the foveal non-atrophy group. The baseline subretinal fluid (SRF) height was 111.3±76.8 µm in the foveal atrophy group and 205.0±104.4 µm in the foveal non-atrophy group on OCT images (p<0.001). Complete resolution of SRF after treatment was noted in 60.4% and 93.5% of patients in the foveal atrophy and foveal non-atrophy groups at the final visit, respectively (p<0.001). The foveal atrophy group showed worse visual acuity at baseline (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, 0.43±0.33 vs 0.13±0.18, p<0.001) and final visit (0.41±0.32 vs 0.05±0.15, p=0.035).
Conclusions CSC with foveal atrophy was associated with a shallow SRF height, low treatment efficacy and poor vision before and after treatment. We suggest that early active treatment should be considered for eyes with CSC accompanied by a persistent shallow SRF and foveal atrophy.
- Retina
- Prognosis
- Macula
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors KYS drafted and revised the manuscript and acquired and analysed the data. SH and JC revised the manuscript and analysed the data. SGL acquired and analysed the data. SWK designed, drafted, conceptualised, critically revised the manuscript and supervised the study. SJK designed and conceptualised the manuscript and critically revised it. SWK is the guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.