Re:Brimonidine induced uveitis: Extent of the problem?
Josephine CRichards, Ophthalmologist,
Other Contributors:
March 05, 2012
The authors thank the respondent for the observations and comments.
Most of our patients were referred to us by other ophthalmologists.
Unfortunately, as tertiary referral practitioners to the wider ophthalmic
community (uveitis: JCR, glaucoma: WHM and DD) we have no way of knowing
how many patients in our community are on brimonidine or how many cases of
brimonidine induced uveitis may be seen by other consultants. We agree
with the respondent that brimonidine rechallenge testing adds to the
evidence for causality. This has previously been performed, in case
reports by Byles [1] (four patients), Goyal [2] (one patient), Cates [3] (one
patient) and Becker [4] (one patient). In all of these cases, uveitis
recurred on re-exposure. In our case series, all of the patients had field
threatening glaucoma, in one case in an only eye. Given the severity of
their alphagan side effects we could not ethically request that any
patient voluntarily trial re-exposure to the drug when its implication in
uveitis (sometimes hypertensive) is already so well documented.
1. Byles DB, Frith P, Salmon JF. Anterior uveitis as a side effect of
topical brimonidine. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;130(3):287-91.
2. Goyal R, Ram AR. Brimonidine tartarate 0.2% (Alphagan) associated
granulomatous anterior uveitis. Eye (Lond). 2000 Dec;14(Pt 6):908-10.
3. Cates CA, Jeffrey MN. Granulomatous anterior uveitis associated with
0.2% topical brimonidine. Eye (Lond). 2003 Jul;17(5):670-1.
4. Becker HI, Walton RC, Diamant JI, Zegans ME. Anterior uveitis and
concurrent allergic conjunctivitis associated with long-term use of
topical 0.2% brimonidine tartrate. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;122(7):1063-
6.
The authors thank the respondent for the observations and comments. Most of our patients were referred to us by other ophthalmologists. Unfortunately, as tertiary referral practitioners to the wider ophthalmic community (uveitis: JCR, glaucoma: WHM and DD) we have no way of knowing how many patients in our community are on brimonidine or how many cases of brimonidine induced uveitis may be seen by other consultants. We agree with the respondent that brimonidine rechallenge testing adds to the evidence for causality. This has previously been performed, in case reports by Byles [1] (four patients), Goyal [2] (one patient), Cates [3] (one patient) and Becker [4] (one patient). In all of these cases, uveitis recurred on re-exposure. In our case series, all of the patients had field threatening glaucoma, in one case in an only eye. Given the severity of their alphagan side effects we could not ethically request that any patient voluntarily trial re-exposure to the drug when its implication in uveitis (sometimes hypertensive) is already so well documented. 1. Byles DB, Frith P, Salmon JF. Anterior uveitis as a side effect of topical brimonidine. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;130(3):287-91. 2. Goyal R, Ram AR. Brimonidine tartarate 0.2% (Alphagan) associated granulomatous anterior uveitis. Eye (Lond). 2000 Dec;14(Pt 6):908-10. 3. Cates CA, Jeffrey MN. Granulomatous anterior uveitis associated with 0.2% topical brimonidine. Eye (Lond). 2003 Jul;17(5):670-1. 4. Becker HI, Walton RC, Diamant JI, Zegans ME. Anterior uveitis and concurrent allergic conjunctivitis associated with long-term use of topical 0.2% brimonidine tartrate. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;122(7):1063- 6.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared