Table 2

 Median values (25th percentile–75th percentile) of the three model parameters in the study groups for each fundus location. The p values under the variable values indicate the outcome of the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA showed that only the variables Fdt and τ were significantly different among the study groups. Friedman ANOVA showed significant relations between location and variable values

FdtdiscFdtc1Fdt c2Fdt c3Fdtc4
N66.4 (51.0–116.8)58.1 (45.6–88.2)55.9 (41.5–77.2)55.0 (41.2–74.5)53.4 (37.8–69.2)
OHT62.2 (48.6–84.2)57.5 (40.3–73.2)56.0 (40.0–76.3)52.0 (34.1–67.6)48.3 (33.4–66.4)
POAG37.0 (28.2–54.1)34.5 (25.7–58.8)33.3 (24.2–51.9)29.6 (21.1–46.7)29.3 (21.4–45.1)
NPG48.1 (29.5–68.8)44.1 (27.0–65.0)42.1 (27.1–69.2)40.4 (24.7–67.0)40.0 (23.7–65.2)
p=0.0003p=0.024p=0.035p=0.041p=0.018
t0disc t0c1 t0 c2  t0c3 t0 c4
N14.1 (12.1–14.7)14.4 (12.4–15.0)14.6 (12.2–15.3)14.6 (12.4–15.3)14.7 (12.7–15.2)
OHT15.1 (13.7–19.0)15.1 (13.9–19.3)15.7 (14.4–19.8)16.3 (14.4–20.1)16.5 (14.1–20.1)
POAG15.1 (13.9–20.9)14.9 (13.2–20.6)15.1 (13.8–20.7)15.3 (13.2–20.6)15.4 (12.6–20.1)
NPG15.5 (14.0–19.5)16.1 (13.7–20.0)15.8 (13.5–20.2)16.0 (13.3–20.1)16.2 (12.8–20.3)
nsnsnsnsns
τ disc τ c1 τ c2 τ c3 τ c4
N 3.8 (3.3–4.4) 4.1 (3.5–4.5) 4.1 (3.6–4.6) 4.2 (3.7–4.6) 4.2 (3.8–4.8)
OHT 4.1 (3.0–5.0) 4.4 (3.4–6.3) 4.5 (3.8–6.2) 4.5 (3.8–6.2) 4.5 (4.0–6.2)
POAG 5.0 (4.1–6.0) 5.5 (4.3–6.8) 5.6 (4.4–6.7) 5.7 (4.4–7.0) 5.7 (4.5–7.3)
NPG 6.6 (4.8–7.9) 7.5 (5.5–9.3) 6.9 (5.4–9.4) 7.0 (5.5–9.4) 7.0 (5.6–9.4)
p<0.0001p<0.0001p<0.0001p<0.0001p<0.0001