Comparison of Medmont central threshold with Humphrey full threshold and Humphrey SITA showing, kappa statistic, area under the ROC curve (AUC), quadrant analysis, and mean defect correlation
Medmont central threshold (strict) | Medmont central threshold (loose) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Compared with | Compared with | |||
Humphrey full threshold | Humphreys SITA | Humphrey full threshold | Humphrey SITA | |
*p<0.001, **p<0.0001. | ||||
Kappa statistic | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
AUC | 0.94 | 0.92 | ||
Sector correlation (r2 statistic): | ||||
Superonasal | 0.86** | 0.85** | ||
Superotemporal | 0.80** | 0.72** | ||
Inferonasal | 0.69** | 0.62** | ||
Inferotemporal | 0.29** | 0.23** | ||
Mean defect correlation (r2 statistic): | 0.89** | 0.88** |