Table 1

Number of diabetic subjects with a greater number of response abnormalities detected by each pre-amplifier filter setting and mfERG measurement

Number of subjects
100>300 Hz*100<300 Hz
*In this column, the number of abnormal mfERGs in each eye was greater in the 10–100 Hz channel than in the 10–300 Hz channel.
NPDR (n = 17)
Implicit timeStretching method12 (70.6%)1 (5.9%)
Sliding method12 (70.6%)1 (5.9%)
AmplitudeStretching method8 (47.1%)2 (11.8%)
No diabetic retinopathy (n = 12)
Implicit timeStretching method6 (50.0%)0 (0.0%)
Sliding method5 (41.7%)0 (0.0%)
AmplitudeStretching method5 (41.7%)1 (8.3%)