Table 2

 Included studies

NoAuthorsTitleJournalVolumePages
1Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A, Aspinall P, et alSensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice AJO 133327–32
2Kesen MR, Spaeth GL, Henderer JD, et alThe Heidelberg retina tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma AJO 133613–6
3Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, et alThe sensitivity and specificity of single-field non-mydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic colour photography AJO 134204–13
4Tatemichi M, Nakano T, Tanaka K, et alPerformance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry AJO 134529–37
5Williams ZY, Schuman JS, Gamell L, et alOptical coherence tomography measurement of nerve fiber layer thickness and the likelihood of a visual field defect AJO 134538–46
6Kowalski RP, Karenchak LM, Shah C, et alELVIS: a new 24-hour culture test for detecting herpes simplex virus from ocular samples Archives 120960–2
7Funaki S, Shirakashi M, Yaoeda K, et alSpecificity and sensitivity of glaucoma detection in the Japanese population using scanning laser polarimetry BJO 8670–4
8Stanford MR, Gras L, Wade A, et alReliability of expert interpretation of retinal photographs for the diagnosis of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis BJO 86636–9
9Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et alComparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma IOVS 43140–5
10Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KRSensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry IOVS 431277–83
11Rudnisky CJ, Hinz BJ, Tennant MT, et alHigh-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema Ophthalmology 109267–74
12Soliman MA, de Jong LA, Ismaeil AA, et alStandard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage Ophthalmology 109444–54
13Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, et alClinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system Ophthalmology 109595–601
14Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, et alSensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects Ophthalmology 1091052–8
15Bayer AU, Maag KP, Erb CDetection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography Ophthalmology 1091350–61
16Rao SN, Raviv T, Majmudar PA, et alRole of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery Ophthalmology 1091642–6