Table 3

Summary table of uncontrolled ranibizumab clinical trials and key efficacy outcomes

Study designPrONTO (N = 40)32SUSTAIN (N = 531; interim data available for n = 69)30SAILOR Cohort 1 (N = 2378)29
Study typeOpen-label, single-centre, non-randomised, investigator-sponsoredOpen-label, multicentre, non-randomisedSingle-masked, multicentre, randomised
Study duration24 months12 months12 months
Lesion type (percentage of patients with PC/MC/ONC if data available)All CNV types* (17.5/57.5/25)All CNV types†All CNV types
Visit regimen in maintenance phaseMonthlyMonthlyQuarterly
Ranibizumab regimen in maintenance phaseIndividualisedIndividualisedIndividualised
Mean (range) no ranibizumab injections in maintenance phase2.6 (0–10)2.3 (0–7)1.6 (range NA)
Key baseline and efficacy resultsRanibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 40)Ranibizumab 0.3 mg (n = 69; interim data)Ranibizumab 0.5 mg‡ (n = 1209; 490 treatment-naïve; 719 previously treated)
Mean (SD) size of CNV at baselineNANANA
Mean (SD) VA at baseline (letters)56.254.7 (11.0)NA
Stabilisation of VA at 12 months§ (percentage of patients)95.0NANA
Improvement in VA at 12 months¶ (percentage of patients)35.0NA19.3 (treatment-naïve)
16.5 (previously treated)
Mean VA change from baseline (letters)
    After three initial doses+10.8+9.2+7.0 (treatment-naïve)
+6.0 (previously treated)
    At 12 months+9.3+6.7+2.3 (both groups)
    At 24 months+10.7NAPNAP
  • SUSTAIN data are for the intent-to-treat population; the last observation carried forward method was used to calculate missing data.

  • *Additional PrONTO inclusion criteria: BCVA between 20/40 and 20/400 (Snellen equivalent, assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts); optical coherence tomography central retinal thickness ⩾300 μm; evidence of progression.

  • †Additional SUSTAIN inclusion criteria: CNV comprised ⩾50% of the lesion; BCVA between 20/40 and 20/320.

  • ‡Ranibizumab 0.3 mg was also investigated; results are only shown for the licensed 0.5 mg dose.

  • §A loss of <15 letters was defined to be stabilisation of VA.

  • ¶Improvement in VA was defined as an increase of ⩾15 letters.

  • BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CNV, choroidal neovascularisation; MC, minimally classic; NA, not available; NAP, not applicable; ONC, occult (with no classic); PC, predominantly classic; SD, standard deviation; VA, visual acuity.