Table 2

Evaluation of primary outcome, that is, absence of indication for reattaching procedure, based on ITT set (ITT; results for PP set, see online supplementary material)

E1 20 G vitrectomy with EB (n=100)C 20 G vitrectomy without EB (n=98)E1 vs C OR (95% CI)E2 23/25 G vitrectomy without EB (n=57)C 20 G vitrectomy without EB (n=61)E2 vs C OR (95% CI)
Absence of indication for reattaching procedure79 (79.0%)72 (73.5%)1.32†
(0.65 to 2.65)
50 (87.7%)48 (78.7%)2.17†‡*
(0.80 to 5.89)
Additional vitrectomy15 (15.0%)18 (18.4%)4 (7.0%)7 (11.5%)
Additional buckle1 (1.0%)8 (8.2%)3 (5.3%)4 (6.6%)
Other procedure5 (5.0%)4 (4.1%)1 (1.8%)2 (3.3%)
Follow-up <23 weeks§4 (4.0%)7 (7.1%)2 (3.5%)5 (8.2%)
  • *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.

  • †Breslow-Day test of homogeneity of ORs over surgeons, p=0.386 (0.071).

  • ‡Asymptotic p value for the test of the common OR against 0.8 (non-inferiority bound): p=0.05.

  • §And no indication for reattaching procedure during follow-up.

  • EB, encircling band; G, gauge; ITT, intention-to-treat; PP, per-protocol.