Table 3

Evaluation of secondary endpoints visual acuity, sphere and anatomical findings, based on intention-to-treat set (last observation carried forward, mean±SD or count (percentage); results for PP set, see online supplementary material)

Secondary endpointGroup†BaselineWeek 26Difference week 26—baselinePaired t-test 95% CIANCOVA‡, E1/2 vs C mean difference, 95% CI
Visual acuity, logMARE1 (n=98)1.0±0.70.3±0.4−0.7±0.7−0.8 to −0.6***
C (n=97)0.9±0.70.3±0.4−0.6±0.6−0.8 to −0.5***0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1)
E2 (n=55)1.0±0.60.3±0.4−0.8±0.6−0.9 to −0.6***
C (n=60)1.0±0.70.3±0.3−0.7±0.7−0.9 to −0.6***0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1)
Sphere, dioptreE1 (n=97)0.1±1.4−0.9±1.5−1.0±1.9−1.4 to −0.6***
C (n=96)−0.1±1.4−0.2±1.9−0.1±1.8−0.5 to 0.2−0.8 (−1.2 to −0.3)***
E2 (n=55)−0.1±1.2−0.2±1.3−0.1±1.5−0.5 to 0.3
C (n=60)−0.1±1.3−0.2±1.6−0.1±1.4−0.5 to 0.3−0.0 (−0.5 to 0.5), 0.878
Group†BaselineWeek 26Exact Fisher test, week 26, E1/2 vs C OR, 95% CI
Retina fully attachedE1 (n=99)0 (0.0%)95 (96.0%)
C (n=98)0 (0.0%)94 (96.0%)1.0 (0.2 to 4.2)
E2 (n=57)1 (1.8%)54 (94.7%)
C (n=61)0 (0.0%)57 (93.4%)1.3 (0.3 to 5.9)
Retina PVR grade CE1 (n=97)0 (0.0%)4 (4.1%)
C (n=96)1 (1.0%)2 (2.1%)2.0 (0.4 to 11.3)
E2 (n=53)1 (1.9%)2 (3.8%)
C (n=59)1 (1.7%)2 (3.4%)1.1 (0.2 to 8.2)
  • *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.

  • †Patients with missing baseline value were excluded.

  • ‡Adjusted for baseline value.ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; C, 20 gauge vitrectomy without encircling band (EB); E1, 20 gauge vitrectomy with EB; E2, 23/25 gauge vitrectomy without EB; PP, per-protocol.