Structure | Study | Dose of IC moxifloxacin | (−) No toxicity, (+) toxicity | Study details | |
Eyes (−) | Eyes (+) | ||||
Cornea | Matsuura et al 40 | 15 mcg/0.1 mL | 36† | 0† | Cohort. There was no difference in ECC and CCT in 15 mcg/0.1 mL and control as well as in comparison of 50 mcg/0.1 mL. Matsuura et al used the bag and chamber flushing method for ICM administration in their studies. This method irrigates the anterior chamber and the area behind the intraocular lens. |
15 mcg/0.1 mL versus 50 mcg/0.1 mL | 66† | 0† | |||
Matsuura et al 19 | 20 mcg/0.1 mL | 555* | 0* | Cohort. No difference was observed in ECL between treatment (ICM) and control. | |
Kowalski et al 56 | 25 mcg/0.1 mL | 3† | 0† | Animal study. ICM compared with ICV. The corneal thickness increased on day 1; however, thickness returned to normal on day 7. No difference in CCT was found between groups. | |
50 mcg/0.1 mL | 3† | 0† | |||
Matsuura et al 45 | 50 mcg/0.1 mL | 6* | 0* | Cohort. No toxic finding reported. | |
Arbisser41 | 100 mcg/0.1 mL | 200* | 0* | Cohort. No stromal oedema was observed. | |
Akal et al 50 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 2‡ | 8‡ | Animal study. Staining for apoptotic activity with caspase-3 and caspase-8 was higher in the moxifloxacin group versus control and sham injection (P>0.05). | |
Arslan et al 43 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 0* | 55* | Cohort. All patients had a history of PK. ECC was reduced (P<0.001) and CCT increased (P<0.001). However, results are similar to other reported phacoemulsification cases. | |
Asena et al 49 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 48† | 0† | Animal study. No differences in the corneal findings. | |
Espiritu et al 42 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 65* | 0* | Cohort. No difference in ECC (P=0.737) and pachymetry (P=0.65). | |
Kim et al 46 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 9† | 0† | Animal study. No statistical difference in CCT (P=0.06). | |
Kobayakawa et al 47 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 6† | 0† | Animal study. Corneal damage rate was found to be 0% with moxifloxacin. | |
Ekinci Koktekir and Aslan 44 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 30* | 0* | Cohort. Postoperative pachymetry in ICM versus control was not significantly different (P=0.345). | |
Lane et al 48 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 26* | 0* | RCT. ICM versus BSS. No difference in ECC or CCT at 3 months (P>0.05). | |
Zhou et al 51 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 91* | 0* | Cohort. No difference between patients receiving ICM and topical moxifloxacin drops. | |
Cetinkaya et al 52 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 33* | 0* | Cohort. No difference in corneal oedema compared with control. | |
AC | Arbisser41 | 100 mcg/0.1 mL | 200* | 0* | Cohort. Postoperative day 1 AC cell was lower in the ICM group (P=0.0007). |
Espiritu et al 42 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 65* | 0* | Cohort. AC cell noted on postoperative day 1 which resolved on next exam. | |
Lane et al 48 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 17* | 9* | RCT. Not significantly different from controls (P>0.05). | |
Zhou et al 51 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 91* | 0* | Cohort. No difference between patients receiving ICM and topical moxifloxacin drops. | |
Cetinkaya et al 52 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL16 | 33* | 0* | Cohort. No difference between patients receiving ICM and topical moxifloxacin drops. | |
IOP | Matsuura et al 40 | 15 mcg/0.1 mL | 36† | 0† | Cohort. No difference in IOP (P>0.5) at 3 months for both comparisons. |
15 mcg/0.1 mL versus 50 mcg/0.1 mL | 33† | 0† | |||
Ekinci Koktekir and Aslan44 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 30* | 0* | Cohort. No difference in IOP versus control (P=0.15). | |
Lane et al 48 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 26* | 0* | RCT. No difference in IOP versus control (P>0.05). | |
Cetinkaya et al 52 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL16 | 33* | 0* | Cohort. No difference in IOP versus control (P>0.05). | |
Retina | Matsuura et al 40 | 15 mcg/0.1 mL | 36† | 0† | Cohort. No difference in FT at 1 and 3 months for both comparisons (P>0.05). |
15 mcg/0.1 mL versus 50 mcg/0.1 mL | 33† | 0† | |||
Arbisser41 | 100 mcg/0.1 mL | 31* | 0* | Cohort. Macular thickness and volume showed mean increases of less than 3% and 4% in all sectors, respectively, compared with preoperative readings. | |
Ekinci Koktekir and Aslan44 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 30* | 0* | Cohort. No difference in macular thickness versus control groups (P=0.107). | |
VA | Espiritu et al 42 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 65* | 0* | Cohort. All eyes had VA 20/30 or better. |
Lane et al 48 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 26* | 0* | RCT. All eyes had VA 20/30 or better. | |
Zhou et al 51 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 91* | 0* | Cohort. No difference between patients receiving ICM and topical moxifloxacin drops. | |
Cetinkaya et al 52 | 500 mcg/0.1 mL | 33* | 0* | Cohort. No significant difference in VA compared with control. |
*Human eyes.
†Rabbit eyes.
‡Rat eyes.
AC, anterior chamber; BSS, balanced salt solution; CCT, central corneal thickness; ECC, endothelial cell count; ECL, endothelial cell loss; FT, foveal thickness; IC, intracameral; ICM, intracameral moxifloxacin; ICV, intracameral vancomycin; IOP, intraocular pressure; PK, penetrating keratoplasty; RCT, randomised controlled trial; VA, visual acuity.