Table 4

Reasons for face-to-face referrals stratified by disease and diabetic retinopathy grading

DR gradeReferrals to face to faceUrgent (detection of treatable disease)Image qualityNot suitable for virtualRegular (eg, cataract)Booking errorPatient requestGlaucoma suspect
R0M0311 (3.0%)19 (57.6%)3 (9.1%)8 (24.2%)
R1M0702 (2.8%)45 (63.4%)8 (11.3%)12 (16.9%)1 (1.4%)1 (1.4%)1 (1.4%)
R1M16619 (28.4%)12 (17.9%)11 (16.4%)22 (32.8$)1 (1.5%)1 (1.5%)
R2M0141 (7.1%)4 (28.6%)4 (28.6%)5 (35.7%)
R2M13614 (37.8%)6 (16.2%)9 (24.3%)6 (16.2%)1 (2.7%)
R3M0331 (3.0%)11 (33.3%)13 (39.4%)6 (18.2%)1 (3.0%)1 (3.0%)
R3M1343 (8.8%)14 (41.2%)9 (26.5%)7 (20.6%)1 (2.9%)
AMD2211 (50%)5 (22.7%)5 (22.7%)1 (4.5%)
RVO1713 (72.2%)1 (5.6%)2 (11.2%)1 (5.6%)
CSR31 (33.5)2 (66.7%)
Total32666 (20.2%)112 (34.7%)66 (20.2%)72 (22.1%)5 (1.5%)4 (1.2%)1 (0.3%)
  • AMD, age-related macular degeneration; CSR,  central  serous  retinopathy; DR, diabetic retinopathy; RVO, retinal vein occlusion.