Table 2

Comparison of RNFL thickness measured by two OCT systems, stratified by glaucoma status

RegionSS-OCTSD-OCTMean difference (95% CI)*ICC (95% CI)†
Mean (SD)COVMean (SD)COV
Total
(n=94, n=57)
Inferior114.1 (24.3)4.7113.0 (22.4)5.051.1 (−0.7 to 3.0)
p=0.231
0.92 (0.88 to 0.95)
Superior106.9 (22.3)4.79107.0 (20.3)5.26−0.1 (−1.9 to 1.6)
p=0.868
0.91 (0.87 to 0.94)
Nasal69.7 (11.5)6.0466.3 (9.3)7.12 3.4 (2.0 to 4.8)
p<0.001
0.73 (0.64 to 0.82)
Temporal75.6 (13.7)5.5267.9 (12.3)5.51 7.7 (6.6 to 8.8)
p<0.001
0.79 (0.71 to 0.85)
Global91.6 (13.5)6.7888.6 (12.5)7.08 3.0 (2.1 to 3.9)
p<0.001
0.91 (0.86to 0.94)
Glaucoma
(n=12, n=9)
Inferior77.8 (20.9)3.7277.8 (21.0)3.7−0.0 (−4.6 to 4.6)
p=0.995
0.95 (0.89 to 0.98)
Superior81.3 (23.8)3.4280.6 (21.2)3.80.7 (−3.5 to 4.9)
p=0.707
0.93 (0.78to 0.98)
Nasal65.0 (13.9)4.6863.5 (11.6)5.471.5 (−4.7 to 7.7)
p=0.596
0.76 (0.41 to 0.92)
Temporal63.7 (15.2)4.1856.5 (13.7)4.13 7.2 (3.3 to 1
1.1)
p=0.003
0.81 (0.65 to 0.92)
Global71.9 (14.5)4.9769.6 (13.6)5.13 2.3 (0.0 to 4.7)
p=0.050
0.95 (0.89 to 0.98)
OHT
(n=8, n=5)
Inferior122.8 (22.1)5.56119.1 (18.2)6.543.7 (−4.6 to 11.9)
p=0.285
0.88 (0.13 to 0.92)
Superior109.0 (13.2)8.28108.3 (16.4)6.60.7 (−6.8 to 8.2)
p=0.815
0.88 (0.64 to 0.96)
Nasal70.4 (9.6)7.3265.8 (9.9)6.674.6 (−7.1 to 16.3)
p=0.338
0.31 (0.00 to 0.61)
Temporal79.1 (22.3)3.5573.2 (19.0)3.85 5.9 (1.3 to 10.6)
p=0.024
0.94 (0.82 to 0.98)
Global95.3 (12.3)7.7691.6 (10.0)9.123.7 (−1.0 to 8.4)
p=0.092
0.82 (0.67 to 0.92)
Normal
(n=74, n=45)
Inferior119.1 (19.7)6.03118.1 (17.5)6.741.0 (−1.2 to 3.2)
p=0.354
0.87 (0.81 to 0.92)
Superior110.8 (20.2)5.48111.2 (17.3)6.41−0.4 (−2.5 to 1.8)
p=0.726
0.88 (0.83 to 0.91)
Nasal70.4 (11.3)6.2366.9 (8.9)7.51 3.6 (2.2 to 5.0)
p<0.001
0.76 (0.68 to 0.84)
Temporal77.2 (11.4)6.7969.2 (10.2)6.77 8.0 (6.7 to 9.2)
p<0.001
0.71 (0.61 to 0.79)
Global94.4 (10.7)8.8691.3 (9.7)9.41 3.1 (2.0 to 4.1)
p<0.001
0.86 (0.79 to 0.90)
  • *The sandwich estimator that allows for clustering for patient was used to calculate SEs.

  • †Non-parametric cluster-resampled bootstrapping was used to derive the sampling distribution of ICC estimates.

  • COV, coefficient of variance; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; OCT, optical coherence tomography; SS, swept-source.