n (%) | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | P value | ||||||
SE | Myopia | SE | Myopia | SE | Myopia | SE | Myopia | SE | Myopia | |||
Mean | % | Mean | % | Mean | % | Mean | % | Mean | % | |||
All students* | 15 052 | ‒0.23±1.24 | 34.05 | ‒0.46±1.32 | 42.37 | ‒0.65±1.44 | 48.50 | ‒0.84±1.52 | 54.29 | ‒1.01±1.59 | 58.30 | – |
Study sample | 10 743 | ‒0.22±1.21 | 33.72 | ‒0.45±1.29 | 42.10 | ‒0.65±1.41 | 48.26 | ‒0.82±1.49 | 54.03 | ‒0.99±1.57 | 57.90 | – |
Gender | ||||||||||||
Female | 5078 (47.26) | ‒0.15±1.22 | 31.49 | ‒0.39±1.29 | 40.36 | ‒0.60±1.40 | 47.69 | ‒0.78±1.47 | 53.70 | ‒0.95±1.56 | 57.19 | <0.001 |
Male | 5665 (52.73) | ‒0.27±1.19 | 35.72 | ‒0.51±1.29 | 43.63 | ‒0.69±1.41 | 48.78 | ‒0.86±1.5 | 54.32 | ‒1.03±1.58 | 58.54 | |
Paternal high myopia | ||||||||||||
None | 8280 (77.07) | ‒0.14±1.17 | 31.25 | ‒0.36±1.25 | 39.21 | ‒0.55±1.37 | 45.49 | ‒0.72±1.44 | 50.99 | ‒0.88±1.51 | 55.03 | <0.001 |
High myopic | 2177 (20.26) | ‒0.49±1.30 | 43.23 | ‒0.79±1.39 | 53.24 | ‒1.01±1.50 | 59.20 | ‒1.23±1.58 | 65.56 | ‒1.46±1.72 | 69.19 | |
Maternal high myopia | ||||||||||||
None | 7832 (72.90) | ‒0.11±1.14 | 30.74 | ‒0.34±1.22 | 38.65 | ‒0.51±1.33 | 44.20 | ‒0.70±1.41 | 50.10 | ‒0.85±1.48 | 54.04 | <0.001 |
High myopic | 2644 (24.61) | ‒0.52±1.35 | 42.87 | ‒0.78±1.43 | 52.47 | ‒1.04±1.57 | 60.09 | ‒1.20±1.65 | 65.09 | ‒1.41±1.76 | 68.79 | |
Myopia treatment | ||||||||||||
No | 1684 (15.67) | ‒0.30±1.26 | 37.37 | ‒0.52±1.33 | 44.72 | ‒0.72±1.43 | 51.30 | ‒0.90±1.51 | 57.49 | ‒1.08±1.59 | 62.11 | <0.001 |
Yes | 9011 (83.87) | 0.21±0.75 | 14.98 | ‒0.04±0.92 | 25.33 | ‒0.15±1.08 | 26.35 | ‒0.30±1.19 | 28.47 | ‒0.39±1.28 | 27.56 |
Following time: T1=July‒October 2015, T2=January‒May 2016, T3=July‒October 2016, T4=January‒May 2017, T5=July‒October 2017.
The demographics, changes of refraction status and myopia prevalence of children aged 9–11 years in Myopia Investigation study in Taipei. The mean SE at baseline was −0.22 D, and SEs were –0.45, –0.65, −0.82 and −0.99 at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow-up, respectivel. The comparisons of SE showed significant difference between subgroups: students with/without family history of high myopia and with/without myopia treatment.
*All students underwent cycloplegic refraction examination when they were included in the programme in 2014. Students using orthokeratology were excluded.
SE, spherical equivalent.