Table 1

Demographics, refraction status and myopia prevalence of children

n (%)T1T2T3T4T5P value
SEMyopiaSEMyopiaSEMyopiaSEMyopiaSEMyopia
Mean%Mean%Mean%Mean%Mean%
All students*15 052‒0.23±1.2434.05‒0.46±1.3242.37‒0.65±1.4448.50‒0.84±1.5254.29‒1.01±1.5958.30
Study sample10 743‒0.22±1.2133.72‒0.45±1.2942.10‒0.65±1.4148.26‒0.82±1.4954.03‒0.99±1.5757.90
Gender
 Female5078 (47.26)‒0.15±1.2231.49‒0.39±1.2940.36‒0.60±1.4047.69‒0.78±1.4753.70‒0.95±1.5657.19<0.001
 Male5665 (52.73)‒0.27±1.1935.72‒0.51±1.2943.63‒0.69±1.4148.78‒0.86±1.554.32‒1.03±1.5858.54
Paternal high myopia
 None8280 (77.07)‒0.14±1.1731.25‒0.36±1.2539.21‒0.55±1.3745.49‒0.72±1.4450.99‒0.88±1.5155.03<0.001
 High myopic2177 (20.26)‒0.49±1.3043.23‒0.79±1.3953.24‒1.01±1.5059.20‒1.23±1.5865.56‒1.46±1.7269.19
Maternal high myopia
 None7832 (72.90)‒0.11±1.1430.74‒0.34±1.2238.65‒0.51±1.3344.20‒0.70±1.4150.10‒0.85±1.4854.04<0.001
 High myopic2644 (24.61)‒0.52±1.3542.87‒0.78±1.4352.47‒1.04±1.5760.09‒1.20±1.6565.09‒1.41±1.7668.79
Myopia treatment
 No1684 (15.67)‒0.30±1.2637.37‒0.52±1.3344.72‒0.72±1.4351.30‒0.90±1.5157.49‒1.08±1.5962.11 <0.001
 Yes9011 (83.87)0.21±0.7514.98‒0.04±0.9225.33‒0.15±1.0826.35‒0.30±1.1928.47‒0.39±1.2827.56
  • Following time: T1=July‒October 2015, T2=January‒May 2016, T3=July‒October 2016, T4=January‒May 2017, T5=July‒October 2017.

  • The demographics, changes of refraction status and myopia prevalence of children aged 9–11 years in Myopia Investigation study in Taipei. The mean SE at baseline was −0.22 D, and SEs were –0.45, –0.65, −0.82 and −0.99 at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow-up, respectivel. The comparisons of SE showed significant difference between subgroups: students with/without family history of high myopia and with/without myopia treatment.

  • *All students underwent cycloplegic refraction examination when they were included in the programme in 2014. Students using orthokeratology were excluded.

  • SE, spherical equivalent.