Table 1

Primary and secondary outcomes (visual acuity and number of anti-VEGF injections) at month 36

Baseline to month 36Month 24 to month 36
EMB+ranibizumab groupRanibizumab monotherapy groupDifference
(95% CI)
EMB+ranibizumab groupRanibizumab monotherapy groupDifference
(95% CI)
nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean
(SD)
nMean
(SD)
Co-primary outcomes
BCVA change, ETDRS letters238−19.7 (18.5)119−4.8 (12.5)−14.9
(−18.5 to −11.2)
238−8.9 (12.9)119−3.4 (8.6)−5.5
(−8.1 to −2.9)
Number of anti-VEGF retreatments*24412.1 (8.1)11911.4 (6.1)0.7 (−0.9 to 2.3)2003.6 (3.3)1023.9 (2.7)−0.3 (−1.0 to 0.4)
Secondary BCVA outcomes
<15 ETDRS letter loss (%)244107 (43.9%)11995 (79.8%)35.9%
(25.7 to 44.7)
244185 (75.8%)119111 (93.3%)17.5%
(10.5 to 24.5)
≥0 ETDRS letter gain (%)24435 (14.3%)11941 (34.5%)20.2%
(10.8 to 29.8)
24454 (22.1%)11946 (38.6%)16.5%
(6.3 to 26.7)
≥15 ETDRS letter gain (%)2440 (0.0%)1193 (2.5%)2.5%
(0.2 to 7.2)
2442 (0.8%)1192 (1.7%)0.9%
(−1.7 to 3.4)
  • Results for co-primary outcomes are based on analysis of covariance model of the change in visual acuity, adjusting for baseline visual acuity, baseline lens status and baseline lesion type.

  • *Ranibizumab was the anti-VEGF agent administered until month 24. After month 24 when the participants returned to standard care, the anti-VEGF drug was either ranibizumab or aflibercept.

  • BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; EMB, epimacular brachytherapy; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.