Table 5

Summary of the main studies assessing HBOT for treating retinal artery occlusion

Study, yearCurrent study, 2021Beiran et al, 200114Weinberger et al, 200215Menzel-Severin et al, 201216Hadanny et al, 20167Elder et al, 201717Wu et al, 201819
Study designProsp.
Non-Comp.
Retrosp. Comp.Prosp.
Non-Comp.
Retrosp.
Comp.
Restrosp.
Non-Comp.
Restrosp.
Non-Comp.
Meta-analysis
TreatmentHBOTHBOT vs Observ.HBOT+HDHBOT+HD vs. HDHBOTHBOTHBOT
No of patients3172218012831251
Inclusion criteriaCRAO+BRAO for <7 daysCRAO+BRAO for <8 hoursCRAO for <12 hoursCRAO for<12 hour with BCVA<+1 logMARCRAO for<20 hour with BCVA<0.5 logMARCRAO+BRAOCRAO+BRAO
Mean age (years)68.369.5 vs 56NR69 vs 7466.470NR
Mean initial BCVA (logMAR)+1.51+1 vs. +1.1+2.3 to +1.1+1.8 vs +1.7+2.14+2.3 to +0.2NR
Mean final BCVA (logMAR)+1.1+0.5 vs. +0.9NR+1.5 vs +1.6+1.62+2.6 to −0.1NR
Success criteriaImprov. ≥0.3 logMARImprov. ≥3 Snellen linesSubjective visual improv.Improv. ≥3 Snellen linesImprov. ≥0.3 logMARNRNR
Visual improv. according to the success criterion (%)48.482.9 vs 29.7 p=0.00090.538.8 vs 17.9 p=0.0667.229ten to 90
OR 5.61 (3.6–8.73)
Good prognosis factorsAntiplatelets on referralHigh blood pressureNRAspirinNo cherry red spotTime to treatmentDuration of HBOT
Mean no of HBOT sessions34NRNR544NR
HBOT-related adverse events (%)Barotrauma
(19.4)
Hypertension during the session (29.0)
NRNRNoneBarotrauma (2.3)
Otalgia (1.5) Epistaxis (0.7) Dyspnoea (0.7)
Claustrophobia, barotrauma, acute upper respiratory tract infectionNR
  • BRAO, branch retinal artery occlusion; Comp, comparative; CRAO, central retinal artery occlusion; HBOT, hyperbaric oxygen therapy; HD, haemodilution; logMAR, Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution; NR, not reported; Observ, observation; Prosp, prospective; RAO, retinal artery occlusion; Retrosp, retrospective; VA, visual acuity.