Table 2

Systemic and ophthalmological parameters among different fundus tessellation grades

VariablesFundus tessellation gradeP value*P trend†Post-hoc test‡
Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Systemic parameters
 Age, years10.26±0.6210.31±0.5610.32±0.6510.33±0.490.3990.451
 Boys, n (%)245 (45.7)213 (49.8)66 (51.6)18 (51.4)0.4800.140
 Height, cm143.43±7.29143.16±7.38142.50±7.40143.67±9.660.6190.992
 Weight, kg39.19±9.3438.86±9.6637.65±8.4939.74±12.840.3920.928
 Body mass index, kg/cm²18.88±3.4118.77±3.4518.39±3.1218.79±3.760.5490.721
Ophthalmological parameters
 Spherical equivalent, dioptre−1.42±0.66−1.45±0.71−1.53±0.70−1.40±0.720.3780.899
 Axial length, mm24.04±0.7124.20±0.7024.50±0.8224.48±0.70 <0.001 <0.001 Grade 0/1<2/3
 Corneal radius of curvature, mm7.77±0.247.83±0.247.95±0.267.97±0.25 <0.001 <0.001 Grade 0/1<2/3
 Axial length/corneal radius of curvature3.10±0.073.10±0.073.08±0.063.07±0.070.059 0.030
 Macular choroidal thickness, μm234.07±40.13205.04±33.24179.28±29.95154.15±22.70 <0.001 <0.001 Grade 0/1>2/3
 Macular retinal thickness, μm278.70±11.03274.80±11.00271.54±12.40273.34±7.95 <0.001 0.001 Grade 0>1/2/3
 Subfoveal choroidal thickness, μm250.83±51.29216.96±42.24187.00±38.21159.12±27.82 <0.001 <0.001 Grade 0/1>2/3
 Foveal retinal thickness, μm232.56±16.48230.48±16.87229.70±15.41231.48±15.200.1520.653
  • P values < 0.05 were in bold.

  • *Analysis of variance or χ2 test to compare systemic or ophthalmological parameters in groups with different fundus tessellation grades.

  • †P trend was acquired by trend test.

  • ‡Post-hoc tests among tessellation groups were conducted with Student-Newman-Keuls method.