Article Text

Download PDFPDF
First clinical results with a new 200 kHz femtosecond laser system
  1. Christoph Winkler von Mohrenfels1,
  2. Ramin Khoramnia1,
  3. Josefina Salgado2,
  4. Christian Wüllner3,
  5. Christof Donitzky3,
  6. Mathias Maier1,
  7. Chris P Lohmann1
  1. 1Augenklinik Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  2. 2Augenklinik, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany
  3. 3WaveLight GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Christoph Winkler von Mohrenfels, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, Munich 81675, Germany; christoph.wvm{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to perform the first femtosecond laser cuts with a new prototype femtosecond laser, in vivo and to evaluate its safety, stability and efficacy.

Methods A LASIK cut was performed with a prototype 200 kHz femtosecond laser in both eyes of nine patients and one eye of two patients (20 individual eyes in total). A complete ophthalmic examination was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure.

Results In the pilot series of 20 eyes, flap creation was possible in each case. The mean preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent was À−4.22 D (SD±61.22 D). The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was À−0.1 D (SD±60.26 D) at 1 month, À−0.22 D (SD±60.24 D) at 3 months and À−0.15 D (SD±60.16 D) 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions Femto-LASIK with this new laser system showed high levels of safety, stability and efficacy without any enhancement.

Clinical trials registration http://www.dimdi.de. DE/CA126/AP4/3332/27/09. Bfam registration 09/03/2009, DE/CA126.

  • Cornea
  • excimer laser
  • femtosecond laser
  • flap creation
  • LASIK

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests CWvM, RK, JS, MM and CPL none. CW and CD are employees of WaveLight GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained from the local ethics board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • At a glance
    Harminder Singh Dua Arun D Singh