Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of the Henson Central Field Screener for the detection of visual field defects, especially in glaucoma

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Henson Central Field Screener is a recently marketed, relatively inexpensive campimeter with semi-automated registration of responses. The strategy used is suprathreshold, eccentricity-compensated, multiple stimulus static perimetry. The clinical usefulness of this apparatus was tested in a number of glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects and normals, as well as in subjects with other ocular disorders, for whom stable visual fields as tested with other perimeters were available. The results obtained with the Henson Screener are generally in agreement with the known defects. The apparatus has some drawbacks, however.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chauhan BC, Henson DB. The distribution of visual field scores in a normal population. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1987; 49: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sponsel WE, Hobley A, Henson DB, Chauhan BC, Dallas NL. Quantitative suprathreshold static perimetry: the value of field score and asymmetry analysis in the early detection of chronic open angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1987; 49: 217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henson DB, Bryson H. Clinical results with the Henson-Hamblin CFS2000. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1987; 49: 233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langerhorst, C.T., Bakker, D. & Raakman, M.A.C. Usefulness of the Henson Central Field Screener for the detection of visual field defects, especially in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 72, 279–285 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153495

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153495

Key words

Navigation