Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of forward light scatter on the visual field indices in glaucoma

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light scatter was induced in 15 glaucoma patients, exhibiting clear media and moderate field loss, using cells containing varying concentrations of 0.5 μm diameter latex beads in distilled water. The right eye was examined with program G1 on the Octopus 201, and with a 45° threshold profile on the Dicon AP3000, with and without a given cell. Forward light scatter due to the cell was assessed by measuring the depression of contrast sensitivity, with the Nicolet CS2000, under glare conditions. Perimetric mean sensitivity decreased linearly and loss variance decreased curvilinearly with increase in forward scatter. Threshold values for 26 glaucoma patients, determined in the absence of induced scatter, were then corrected for the effects of naturally occurring intraocular light scatter [44]. The recalculated mean defect decreased linearly while loss variance remained essentially unchanged. Forward light scatter therefore predominantly exaggerates diffuse loss; the apparent underestimation of focal defects caused by induced scatter is partly a computational artefact resulting from inapplicable age-matched normal reference data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J (1986) Impairment of contrast sensitivity function (CSF) as a measure of disability glare. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:1131–1136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen MJ, Vos JJ (1967) Ocular scattered light and visual performance as a function of age. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 44:717–727

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ (1978) A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity — preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:23–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Augustiny L, Flammer J (1985) The influence of artificially induced visual field defects on the visual field indices. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42: 55–67

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bettelheim FA, Ali S (1985) Light scattering of normal human lens III. Relationship between forward and back scatter of whole excised lenses. Exp Eye Res 41:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bigger JF, Becker B (1971) Cataracts and open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 71:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell FW, Green DG (1965) Optical and neural factors affecting resolution. J Physiol (Lond) 181:576–593

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caprioli J, Sears M (1987) Patterns of early visual field loss in open angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:307–315

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Natale R, Flammer J (1988) The relationship between the lens opacity meter 701 readings and the visual field. International Perimetric Society Meeting Vancouver, Canada 9–12 May. In: Perimetry Update 1988/89

  10. Eichenberger D, Hendickson P, Robert Y, Gloor B (1987) Influence of ocular media on perimetric results, 2. Effect of simulated cataract. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flammer J (1986) The concept of visual field indices. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 224:389–392

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flammer J, Bebie H (1987) Lens opacity meter: a new instrument to quantify lens opacity. Ophthalmologica 195:69–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M (1984) Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuations in patients with glaucoma, normal controls and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102:876–879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Greve EL (1973) Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma: the two phases of examination. Doc Ophthalmol 36:1–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greve EL (1979) Visual field, glaucoma and cataract. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 19:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths SN, Drasdo N, Barnes DA, Sabell AG (1986) Effect of epithelial and stromal edema on the light scattering properties of the cornea. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63:888–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guthauser U, Flammer J (1988) Quantifying visual field damage caused by cataract. Am J Ophthalmol 106:480–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guthauser U, Flammer J, Niesel P (1987) Relationship between cataract density and visual field damage. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:39–41

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heijl A, Lindgren E, Olsson J (1989) The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 107:81–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendrickson P, Eichenberger D, Gloor B, Robert Y (1987) Influence of ocular media on perimetric results, 1. Effect of IOL implantation. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hess RF, Garner LF (1977) The effect of corneal oedema on visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16:5–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hess R, Woo G (1978) Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:428–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heuer DK, Anderson DR, Feuer RW, Knighton RW, Gressel MG, Fantes FE (1988) The influence of simulated light scattering on automated perimetric threshold measurements. Arch Ophthamol 106:1247–1251

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klewin KM, Radius R (1986) Background illumination and automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 104:395–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolker AE, Hetherington J (1976) Becker and Schaffer's diagnosis and therapy of the glaucomas. Mosby, St. Louis, p 163

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lundh BL (1985) Central and peripheral contrast sensitivity for static and dynamic sinusoidal gratings in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 63:487–492

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lyne AJ, Phillips CI (1969) Visual field defects due to opacities in the optical media. Br J Ophthalmol 53:119–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mikelberg FS, Drance SM, Schultzer M, Wijsman K (1987) The effect of miosis on visual field indices. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:645–649

    Google Scholar 

  29. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemson D (1983) Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res 23:689–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Paulsson LE, Sjostrand J (1980) Contrast sensitivity in the presence of glare light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19:401–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Radius RL (1978) Perimetry in cataract patients. Arch Ophthalmol 96:1574–1579

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ross JE, Clarke DD, Bron AJ (1985) Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings. Br J Ophthalmol 69:51–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Urner-Bloch U (1987) Simulation of the influence of lens opacities on the perimetric results, investigated with orthoptic occluders. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vaegan, Halliday BL (1982) A forced choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing. Br J Ophthalmol 66:477–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van den Berg TJTP (1986) Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability. Doc Ophthalmol 61:327–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Van den Berg TJTP (1987) Relation between media disturbances and the visual field. Doc Opthalmol Proc Ser 49:38–38

    Google Scholar 

  37. Van den Berg TJTP, Nooteboom RJ (1987) Behavior of visual field indices with a gradient adaptive method. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van den Berg TJTP, Nooteboom RJ, Langerhorst CT, Greve EL (1987) Fluctuation and population differences in automated perimetry and the influence on defect volume estimation. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vos JJ (1983) Describing glare at tunnel entrances, 1. The influence of stray light in the eye. Institute for perception RVO TNO, Report IZF 1983 C-8 Soesterberg, The Netherlands

  40. Werner EB, Adelson AA, Krupin TP (1988) Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 95:764–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wild JM, Dengler-Harles M, Searle AET, O'Neill EC, Crews SJ (1990) The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 67:537–545

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wood JM, Wild JM, Smerdon DL, Crews SJ (1987) The role of intraocular light scatter in the attenuation of the perimetric response. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wood JM, Wild JM, Crews SJ (1987) Induced intraocular light scatter and the sensitivity gradient of the normal visual field. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wood JM, Wild JM, Smerdon DL, Crews SJ (1989) Alterations in the shape of the automated perimetric profile arising from cataract. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wright C, Drasdo N (1985) The influence of age on the spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity function. Doc Ophthalmol 59:383–395

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michael D. Cole

    Present address: Torbay Hospital, Lawes Bridge, PQ2 7AA, Torquay, South Devon, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, B4 7ET, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK

    Maria Dengler-Harles & John M. Wild

  2. Glaucoma Department, Birmingham and Midland Eye Hospital, Church Street, B3 2NS, Birmingham, UK

    Michael D. Cole & Eamon C. O'Neill

  3. Retina Department, Birmingham and Midland Eye Hospital, Church Street, B3 2NS, Birmingham, UK

    S. James Crews

Authors
  1. Maria Dengler-Harles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John M. Wild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael D. Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eamon C. O'Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. James Crews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dengler-Harles, M., Wild, J.M., Cole, M.D. et al. The influence of forward light scatter on the visual field indices in glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228, 326–331 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920056

Keywords

Search

Navigation