Elsevier

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Volume 47, Issue 1, January–February 2003, Pages 6-12
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Laboratory investigations
Refractive Errors and Factors Associated with Myopia in an Adult Japanese Population

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-5155(02)00620-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the refractive status and factors associated with myopia by a population-based survey of Japanese adults.

Methods: A total of 2168 subjects aged 40 to 79 years, randomly selected from a local community, were assessed in a cross-sectional study. The spherical equivalent of the refractive error was calculated and used in a multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate the relationships between myopia and possible related factors.

Results: The mean (± SD) of the spherical equivalent was −0.70 ± 1.40 diopters (D) in men, and −0.50 ± 1.44 D in women. Based on ± 0.5 D cutoff points, the prevalence of myopia, emmetropia, and hypermetropia were 45.7%, 40.8%, and 13.5% in men, and 38.3%, 43.1%, and 18.6% in women, respectively. A 10-year increase in age was associated with reduced risk of myopia [men: odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44–0.62; women: OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54–0.78]. In men, myopia was significantly associated with higher education (high school: OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.3; college: OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3–3.1) and management occupations (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0–2.4). For women, high income (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2), and clerical (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0–2.4) and sales/service occupations (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1–2.6) were also associated with myopia.

Conclusions: The prevalence of myopia in a Japanese population was similar to that in other Asian surveys but higher than in black or white populations. Our study confirmed a higher prevalence of myopia among younger vs. older populations, and a significant association with education levels and socioeconomic factors.

Introduction

Earlier studies have shown that the prevalence of myopia is higher in the Asian population than in black and white populations,1 and several epidemiological studies have shown that both genetic factors, such as race2 and family history,2, 3, 4, 5 and environmental factors, such as education level6, 7, 8 and socioeconomic status,9, 10, 11 are important risk factors for myopia. The prevalence of myopia seems to be increasing worldwide.1, 12 In particular, the incidence of myopia has increased rapidly in younger generations over the past few decades,13, 14, 15 and the concurrent increase in formal education and white-collar occupations may be a reason for this increase.1

In Japan, however, there has been no population-based survey investigating the refractive status in an adult population. Although a nationwide glaucoma survey16 showed the prevalence of refractive errors by age, other factors related to myopia have not yet been analyzed.

In the present study, we investigated the refractive status of middle-aged to elderly populations living in two communities in Aichi prefecture, Japan. In addition, the relationships between myopia and several other factors, such as age, physique, education level, and socioeconomic status, were examined.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Data for the present report were obtained from a population-based survey of aging conducted in Obu-shi and Higashiura-cho, Aichi prefecture, Japan, by the National Institute for Longevity Sciences—the Longitudinal Study of Aging (NILS-LSA). Random sampling from the municipal register, which was stratified by age and sex, identified eligible subjects of the same racial and ethnic origin, aged from 40 to 79 years.

A detailed description of this study design has been reported elsewhere.17 In brief,

Results

The characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 58.7 years for each sex. The mean (± SD) spherical equivalent of the refractive error was −0.70 ± 1.40 D in men and −0.50 ± 1.44 D in women. This constituted a significant difference between the sexes (t-test, P = .001). The older age groups had more hypermetropic refractive errors in both sexes (P < .0001 for trend).

The mean value for pack-years smoked was significantly greater for men than for women (t

Discussion

The main findings of this investigation in a large Japanese population are that the prevalence of myopia was 45.7% in men and 38.3% in women, and that there are significant independent associations between the presence of myopia and several socioeconomic factors.

There are many studies examining the distribution of refractive error and the risk factors for the refractive errors. In an adult population, it has been reported that there is a significant association between myopia and several

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Health Sciences Research Grants (Research on Eye and Ear Sciences, Immunology, Allergy and Organ Transplantation; H12-kannkakuki-009) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan.

References (38)

  • K Attebo et al.

    Refractive errors in an older populationthe Blue Mountains Eye Study

    Ophthalmology

    (1999)
  • I.F Hepsen et al.

    The effect of reading and near-work on the development of myopia in emmetropic boysa prospective, controlled, three-year follow-up study

    Vision Res

    (2001)
  • S.M Saw et al.

    Epidemiology of myopia

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1996)
  • S.M Saw et al.

    Familial clustering and myopia progression in Singapore school children

    Ophthalmic Epidemiol

    (2001)
  • The Framingham Offspring Eye Study Group

    Familial aggregation and prevalence of myopia in the Framingham Offspring Eye Study

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • J.M Teikari et al.

    Impact of heredity in myopia

    Hum Hered

    (1991)
  • C.J Hammond et al.

    Genes and environment in refractive errorthe twin eye study

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2001)
  • Q Wang et al.

    Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye Study

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1994)
  • J Katz et al.

    Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1997)
  • M Rosner et al.

    Intelligence, education, and myopia in males

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1987)
  • M Wensor et al.

    Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1999)
  • T.Y Wong et al.

    Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2000)
  • S.Y Wu et al.

    Refractive errors in a black adult populationthe Barbados Eye Study

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1999)
  • B Bengtsson et al.

    Refractive changes in the elderly

    Acta Ophthalmol Scand

    (1999)
  • A Hosaka

    Population studies—myopia experience in Japan

    Acta Ophthalmol

    (1988)
  • K Sveinsson

    The refraction of Icelanders

    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)

    (1982)
  • M.G Villarreal et al.

    “Myopisation”the refractive tendency in teenagers. Prevalence of myopia among young teenagers in Sweden

    Acta Ophthalmol Scand

    (2000)
  • Y Shiose et al.

    Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan—a nationwide glaucoma survey

    Jpn J Ophthalmol

    (1991)
  • H Shimokata et al.

    A new comprehensive study on aging—the National Institute for Longevity Sciences, Longitudinal Study of Aging (NILS-LSA)

    J Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Prevalence of Normal-Tension Glaucoma in the Chinese Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      2019, American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In relation to the percentage of patients with NTG among patients with POAG, myopia was found to be a reason for the high proportion of NTG. Myopia has emerged as a major health issue in east Asia,77 especially in Japan and China,78,79 and the prevalence of myopia in Japanese and Chinese populations were similar to that in other Asian surveys but higher than in white or black populations.80,81 At the same time, NTG prevalence was reported to be the highest in Japanese populations, which perhaps has resulted in the prevalence of NTG and POAG being higher in this group than in whites and blacks.82

    • The Relationship between the Waveform Parameters from the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Progression of Glaucoma

      2018, Ophthalmology Glaucoma
      Citation Excerpt :

      It should also be noted that relatively young participants were included (>20 years of age) in the current study, potentially including individuals with juvenile glaucoma. It is often difficult to discriminate between juvenile glaucoma and POAG in this age group (20–40 years) with few specific findings for definitive differentiation.80 Furthermore, as life expectancy increases, it is very important to make treatment decisions for young POAG patients.

    • Risk Factors for Myopia: A Review

      2023, Journal of Clinical Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text