Guest editorialLaser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy: an update on indications and safety
References (8)
- et al.
LASIK for moderate and high myopia and myopic astigmatism
Ophthalmology
(1998) - et al.
Results of laser in situ keratomileusis in different degrees of myopia
Ophthalmology
(1998) - et al.
PRK vs LASIK for moderate to high myopiaa randomized prospective study
Ophthalmology
(1998) - et al.
Regression and its mechanisms after LASIK in moderate and high myopia
Ophthalmology
(1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (47)
Late-onset Klebsiella oxytoca flap-margin-related corneal ulcer following laser in situ keratomileusis
2011, Journal of Cataract and Refractive SurgeryA perfluoropolyether corneal inlay for the correction of refractive error
2011, BiomaterialsCitation Excerpt :There is a growing market for new ophthalmic technologies to correct refractive errors, which offer a convenient alternative to contact lenses and spectacles [1]. Laser-based procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and, more recently, laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and Epi-LASIK are meeting much of this demand [2–6]. An alternative approach is the insertion of a biostable polymer lens into the cornea to change the refractive power of the eye by either altering the curvature of the cornea or the refractive index of the material itself (an additive refractive keratoplasty procedure).
Infectious Keratitis in 204 586 LASIK Procedures
2010, OphthalmologyRefractive surgery following penetrating keratoplasty
2008, Corneal Surgery: Theory Technique and Tissue: Fourth EditionLaser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: Visual outcomes and complications
2007, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Copyright © 1998 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.