Mucin genes expressed by the ocular surface Epithelium

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-9462(96)00022-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Mucins are the glycoproteins which form the viscous, gel-like mucus layer of the tear film. Molecular characterization of mucins has been slow due to their heavy glycosylation and high molecular weight, but recent cloning of human gut and trachea, mammary gland, and salivary gland mucins has begun to shed light on the primary structure of these important protective molecules. To date nine human mucin genes, designated MUCI-8, have been cloned. The presence in the protein backbone of tandem repeats of series of amino acids rich in serine and/or threonine is a feature common to all. Numbers and sequences of amino acids in each tandem repeat varies with each mucin. Numbers of amino acids per repeat vary from 169 (MUC6) to 8 (MUC5AC). Until recently little has been known regarding the expression of these genes by the ocular surface epithelium.

This review summarizes recent work from our laboratory aimed at determining the molecular character of mucins expressed by conjunctival and corneal epithelium. Using northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization techniques, we have demonstrated that the stratified epithelium of both cornea and conjunctiva express the transmembrane mucin, MUC1. This widely expressed mucin is the best characterized of the cloned mucins. Using similar methodologies we demonstrated that the conjunctival goblet cell expresses MUC5AC, a gel-forming mucin, which has a cysteine-rich domain responsible for the disulfhydryl bonding between mucin molecules. Conjunctival stratified epithelium expresses MUC4, a relatively uncharacterized mucin, whose function is not known.

Are there additional and/or unique mucins expressed by the ocular surface epithelium? We summarize our recent work on characterization of a mucin isolated from rat and human corneal epithelium. Antibodies to these mucins localize to the glycocalyx of the corneal epithelial apical cells. Since MUCI appears to be the only one of the cloned mucins expressed by the corneal epithelium, it is a candidate for comparison to our mucin isolate. Current efforts are directed toward this comparison.

Identification of mucin genes expressed by the ocular surface epithelium opens many new avenues for investigation into expression, regulation, and glycosylation of mucins in ocular surface pathologies and into the specific character of these molecules which enhance protection from pathogen invasion.

References (71)

  • S.B. Ho et al.

    Expression cloning of gastric mucin complementary DNA and localization of mucin gene expression

    Gastroenterology

    (1995)
  • F.J. Holly

    Formation and rupture of the tear film

    Exp. Eye Res.

    (1973)
  • F.J. Holly et al.

    Tear physiology and dry eye

    Surv. Ophthalmol.

    (1977)
  • A. Kovarik et al.

    Analysis of the tissuespecific promoter of the MUC1 gene

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • M.S. Lan et al.

    Cloning and sequencing of a human pancreatic tumor mucin cDNA

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1990)
  • J.C. Moore et al.

    Human ocular mucus. Origins and preliminary characterisation

    Exp. Eye Res.

    (1979)
  • J.C. Moore et al.

    Human ocular mucus. Chemical studies

    Exp. Eye Res.

    (1981)
  • G. Parry et al.

    Determination of apical membrane polarity in mammary epithelial cell cultures: the role of cell-cell, cell-substratum, and membrane-cytoskeleton interactions

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1990)
  • N. Porchet et al.

    Molecular cloning and chromosomal localization of a novel human tracheo-bronchial mucin cDNA containing tandemly repeated sequences of 48 base pairs

    Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1991)
  • K. Shirotani et al.

    Transcriptional regulation of the MUCI mucin gene in colon carcinoma cells by a soluble factor

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • A.P. Spicer et al.

    Molecular cloning and analysis of the mouse homologue of the tumor-associated mucin, MUCI, reveals conservation of potential O-glycosylation sites, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains and a loss of minisatellite-like polymorphism

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1991)
  • A.P. Spicer et al.

    Delayed mammary tumor progression in Muc-1 Null Mice

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • N.W. Toribara et al.

    Human gastric mucin identification of a unique species by expression cloning

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • M. Abe et al.

    Characterization of cis-acting elements regulating transcription of the human DF3 breast carcinoma-associated antigen (MUC1) gene

  • M. Allen et al.

    The human lacrimal gland. A histochemical and organ culture study of the secretory cells

    Archs Ophthalmol.

    (1972)
  • A.M. Azzarolo et al.

    Hypophysectomy-induced regression of female rat lacrimal glands: partial restoration and maintenance by dihydrotestosterone and prolactin

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci

    (1995)
  • S. Bolis et al.

    Detection and characterization of human ocular surface mucins

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci

    (1995)
  • V.M. Braga et al.

    Modulation of Muc-1 mucin expression in the mouse uterus during the estrus cycle, early pregnancy and placentation

    J. Cell Sci.

    (1993)
  • J. Burchell et al.

    Detection of the tumour associated antigens recognised by the monoclonal antibodies HMFG-1 and 2 in serum from patients with breast cancer

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1984)
  • L. Carlstedt et al.

    Mucous glycoproteins: a gel of a problem

    Essays Biochem.

    (1985)
  • R. Dahiya et al.

    Mucin synthesis and secretion in various human epithelial cancer cell lines that express the MUC-1 mucin gene

    Cancer Res.

    (1993)
  • P.L. Devine et al.

    Mucins: structure, function, and associations with malignancy

    BioEssays

    (1992)
  • P.N. Dilly

    On the nature and the role of the subsurface vesicles in the outer epithelial cells of the conjunctiva

    Br. J. Ophthalmol.

    (1985)
  • P.N. Dilly

    Structure and function of the tear film

  • D.J. Doughman

    Clinical tests

    Int. Ophthalmol. Clin.

    (1973)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text