Original article
Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Optic Disk Algorithms with Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Glaucoma

Presented as a poster at the annual meeting of ARVO, May 1–5, 2005, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.023Get rights and content

Purpose

To compare the performance of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and optic disk algorithms as determined by optical coherence tomography to detect glaucoma.

Design

Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods

setting: Academic tertiary-care center. study population: One eye from 42 control subjects and 65 patients with open-angle glaucoma with visual acuity of ≥20/40, and no other ocular pathologic condition. observation procedures: Two optical coherence tomography algorithms were used: “fast RNFL thickness” and “fast optic disk.” main outcome measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and sensitivities at fixed specificities were used. Discriminating ability of the average RNFL thickness and RNFL thickness in clock-hour sectors and quadrants was compared with the parameters that were derived from the fast optic disk algorithm. Classification and regression trees were used to determine the best combination of parameters for the detection of glaucoma.

Results

The average visual field mean deviation (±SD) was 0.0 ± 1.3 and −5.3 ± 5.0 dB in the control and glaucoma groups, respectively. The RNFL thickness at the 7 o’clock sector, inferior quadrant, and the vertical C/D ratio had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (0.93 ± 0.02, 0.92 ± 0.03, and 0.90 ± 0.03, respectively). At 90% specificity, the best sensitivities (±SE) from each algorithm were 86% ± 3% for RNFL thickness at the 7 o’clock sector and 79% ± 4% for horizontal integrated rim width (estimated rim area). The combination of inferior quadrant RNFL thickness and vertical C/D ratio achieved the best classification (misclassification rate, 6.2%).

Conclusion

The fast optic disk algorithm performs as well as the fast RNFL thickness algorithm for discrimination of glaucoma from normal eyes. A combination of the two algorithms may provide enhanced diagnostic performance.

Section snippets

Material and methods

This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the Glaucoma Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California at Los Angeles. The University’s institutional review board approved this investigation, and all participants gave their approval and signed an informed consent form to participate in the study. Eligible participants were recruited from a clinical database or were enrolled prospectively. Patients with glaucoma and the control group met the following criteria: age

Results

One eye each from 42 normal control subjects and 65 patients with glaucoma were recruited. The demographic characteristics of the study sample are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the control group was not significantly different from that of the glaucoma group (P = .098 and 0.092 for the entire glaucoma and early glaucoma groups, respectively). Average mean deviation (±SD) was 0.0 ± 1.3 dB for normal eyes, −5.3 ± 5.0 dB for all patients with glaucoma, and −2.5 ± 1.6 dB for early glaucomatous

Discussion

The current investigation was carried out to evaluate and compare the performance of the fast RNFL thickness and fast optic disk algorithms of the OCT. The RNFL thickness in the 7 o’clock sector and in the inferior quadrant had the highest AUC for discrimination between normal eyes and eyes with glaucoma. The RNFL thickness in the 7 o’clock sector was also the most sensitive (86% at 90% specificity) among the RNFL thickness parameters. The vertical C/D ratio, HIRW, and VIRA from the automated

Anita Manassakorn, MD, is Visiting Assistant Professor, Glaucoma Division, at Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA and Instructor in Ophthalmology, at Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Her research interests include imaging in glaucoma, visual field progression, and glaucoma management.

References (25)

Cited by (82)

  • Performances of Machine Learning in Detecting Glaucoma Using Fundus and Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Images: A Meta-Analysis

    2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Supplemental Table summarizes the relevant characteristics of included studies examining ML classifier's performance on detecting glaucoma using automated image analysis. Of all included studies, 73 (69.5%) used fundus photographs,18-90 30 (28.6%) used retinal OCT images,17,91-119 and 2 (1.9%) tested ML using both types of images.120,121 Fifty-three studies (50.5%) performed at least 1 session of independent validation, and 24 (22.9%) performed at least 1 session of external validation.

  • Adaptive optics optical coherence tomography in glaucoma

    2017, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The first commercially available TD-OCT (Stratus OCT, Zeiss, Dublin, CA), featured nominal axial resolution of 10 μm, transverse resolution of 20 μm, and scanning speed of 400 axial scans per second. However, this technology was limited by suboptimal resolution and slow scan acquisition rates (Hougaard et al., 2007a, b; Lee et al., 2009; Manassakorn et al., 2006; Medeiros et al., 2005, 2009b; Naithani et al., 2007; Nouri-Mahdavi et al., 2008; Parikh et al., 2007; Wollstein et al., 2005). Hardware advances in commercial systems improved resolution and increased scanning speeds.

  • Thickness related textural properties of retinal nerve fiber layer in color fundus images

    2014, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, these error values are acceptable, since they are still around the level of differences between various OCT devices (∼10–25 μm) [10,19,41]. Moreover, the mean values of RMSEP are also comparable with the general difference between normal and glaucomatous RNFL thickness (∼20–25 μm), as reported by studies [22,23]. As mentioned above, one drawback concerns the blood vessels that cover rather large area of the retina, especially in the ONH surroundings.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Anita Manassakorn, MD, is Visiting Assistant Professor, Glaucoma Division, at Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA and Instructor in Ophthalmology, at Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Her research interests include imaging in glaucoma, visual field progression, and glaucoma management.

Supported by a grant from “Research to Prevent Blindness” and from the National Institutes of Health R01 EY12738.

View full text