Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 113, Issue 10, October 2006, Pages 1695-1705.e6
Ophthalmology

Original Article
Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) in the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Presented in part at: American Academy of Ophthalmology Subspecialty Meeting, October 2005, Chicago, Illinois, and Royal Hawaiian Eye Meeting, January 2006, Wailea, Hawaii.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.064Get rights and content

Purpose

To report the biologic effect of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with retinal and iris neovascularization secondary to diabetes mellitus.

Design

Interventional, consecutive, retrospective, case series.

Participants

Forty-five eyes of 32 patients with retinal and/or iris neovascularization secondary to diabetes mellitus.

Methods

Patients received intravitreal bevacizumab (6.2 μg–1.25 mg). Ophthalmic evaluations included nonstandardized Snellen visual acuity (VA), complete ophthalmic examination, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography.

Main Outcome Measures

Change in fluorescein angiographic leakage of the proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Secondary outcomes included changes in Snellen VA.

Results

No significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed. All patients with neovascularization demonstrated by fluorescein angiography (44/44 eyes) had complete (or at least partial) reduction in leakage of the neovascularization within 1 week after the injection. Complete resolution of angiographic leakage of neovascularization of the disc was noted in 19 of 26 (73%) eyes, and leakage of iris neovascularization completely resolved in 9 of 11 (82%) eyes. The leakage was noted to diminish as early as 24 hours after injection. In addition to the reduction in angiographic leakage, the neovascularization clinically appeared to involute in many patients with a reduction in the caliber or presence of perfused blood vessels. In 2 cases, a subtle decrease in leakage of retinal or iris neovascularization in the fellow uninjected eye was noted, raising the possibility that therapeutic systemic levels were achieved after intravitreal injection. Recurrence of fluorescein leakage varied. Recurrent leakage was seen as early as 2 weeks in one case, whereas in other cases, no recurrent leakage was noted at last follow-up of 11 weeks.

Conclusions

Short-term results suggest that intravitreal bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a rapid regression of retinal and iris neovascularization secondary to PDR. A consistent biologic effect was noted, even with the lowest dose (6.2 μg) tested, supporting proof of concept. The observation of a possible therapeutic effect in the fellow eye raises concern that systemic side effects are possible in patients undergoing treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg), and lower doses may achieve a therapeutic result with less risk of systemic side effects. Further study is indicated.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

Initially, only patients with active iris neovascularization who were unresponsive to traditional treatment were considered for bevacizumab treatment. After a patient with iris and retinal neovascularization was treated and the retinal neovascularization was observed to involute (case 3; Fig 1 [available at http://aaojournal.org]), patients with retinal neovascularization alone were treated. Patients were not offered treatment if they had uncontrolled hypertension or a recent myocardial

Results

Of the 32 patients, 16 were female and 16 were male (Table 1 [available at http://aaojournal.org]). The mean age was 58 years. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 14 weeks, with mean and median follow-up of 5 weeks. The majority (39/45 [87%]) of eyes had received prior panretinal photocoagulation for active retinal or iris neovascularization associated with diabetic retinopathy. The injection appeared to be well tolerated in all patients. No patient developed uveitis, endophthalmitis, ocular toxicity,

Discussion

Since the Diabetic Retinopathy Study, panretinal photocoagulation has been the treatment of choice for PDR.18 It has proven to be remarkably effective and has saved vision in countless patients over the past several decades. However, it is a destructive therapy, with adverse side effects such as loss of peripheral visual field and night vision as well as exacerbation of macular edema and subsequent reduction of central vision.19, 20 In patients with a media opacity such as vitreous hemorrhage

References (23)

  • A.P. Adamis et al.

    Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor prevents retinal ischemia-associated iris neovascularization in a nonhuman primate

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (737)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2006-136.

    Genentech did not sponsor this study.

    Dr Avery has received consulting or advisory fees from the following pharmaceutical companies: Alcon, Eyetech/OSI, Pfizer, Genentech, QLT, and Neovista. Dr Pieramici has received research, consulting, or advisory fees from the following pharmaceutical companies: Eyetech, Genentech, QLT, and Neovista.

    Supported in part by the California Retina Research Foundation, Santa Barbara, California.

    View full text