Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 114, Issue 4, April 2007, Pages 698-704
Ophthalmology

Original Article
Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined 5-Fluorouracil and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Management of Unselected Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments Undergoing Primary Vitrectomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.042Get rights and content

Objective

To determine the efficacy of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of unselected rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) undergoing primary vitrectomy.

Design

Double-masked, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Participants

Six hundred forty-one patients presenting with primary RRD were recruited from 2 specialized vitreoretinal units—Moorfields Eye Hospital, London (n = 553) and St. Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool (n = 88).

Intervention

All patients underwent primary vitrectomy and gas endotamponade. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment group consisted of 5 IU/ml LMWH and 200 μg/ml 5FU added to the perioperative infusion fluid.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure was retinal reattachment after primary vitrectomy without any reoperations at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures recorded at 6 months were the occurrence and grade of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), best-corrected visual acuity in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, intraocular pressure (mmHg), corneal clarity, and complications.

Results

The overall primary success rate was 84.4%; in the treatment group, the primary success rate was 82.3% compared with 86.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.12). At 6 months, the final complete anatomical reattachment rate was 97.9% in both treatment and placebo groups. The number of patients who failed due to the development of PVR was not statistically significant, 23 in the treatment group (7.0%) and 14 in the placebo group (4.9%) (P = 0.309). There was no significant difference in the mean visual acuity at 6 months in the placebo group (0.48) versus the treatment group (0.53; P = 0.072). The visual acuity at 6 months of patients presenting with a macula-sparing retinal detachment was significantly worse in the treatment group (P = 0.0091). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in patients who presented with a macula involving retinal detachment (P = 0.896).

Conclusions

Primary vitrectomy has a high anatomic and visual success rate for RRD. Adjuvant therapy with 5FU and LMWH does not improve the anatomic or visual success rate of unselected primary retinal detachments undergoing vitrectomy. After adjuvant therapy, a worse visual outcome was observed in patients presenting with macula-sparing retinal detachments. A combination of 5FU and LMWH should not be used routinely for primary RRD surgery.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Patients were recruited who had a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment to be managed by primary vitrectomy with intraocular gas tamponade, to include males over 16 years of age and postmenopausal women. The leading indications for primary vitrectomy surgery included retinal detachment with a posterior vitreous detachment owing to superior posterior, multiple, or tractional retinal breaks, pseudophakia, and/or an inadequate view of the fundus, for example, secondary to vitreous hemorrhage. Eyes

Results

Six hundred forty-one patients were recruited from 2 specialized vitreoretinal units—Moorfields Eye Hospital, London (n = 553) and St. Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool (n = 88) between February 2001 and January 2005. Of the 641 patients who were recruited, 342 were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 299 to the placebo group. Figure 1 documents the progress of patients through the trial.

The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar and are presented in Table 1. The mean age of

Discussion

The overall primary anatomic success rate of retinal detachment surgery in this study was 84.4%. At 6 months, the complete reattachment rate was 97.9% and the macular attachment rate was 99.7%. These results compare favorably with current published data1, 2, 5, 7, 21 and are consistent with that seen in specialist units.21 Recruitment of patients for this trial reflects the current management of retinal detachment in the 2 units involved: 70% to 80% of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

References (30)

  • H. Heimann et al.

    Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • M. Bonnet et al.

    Cryopexy in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a risk factor for postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy?

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • N. Duquesne et al.

    Preoperative vitreous hemorrhage associated with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a risk factor for postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy?

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • D.S. Gartry et al.

    Pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment uncomplicated by advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1993)
  • P. Girard et al.

    Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery

    Retina

    (1994)
  • Cited by (130)

    • Controlled release of triamcinolone from an episcleral micro film delivery system for open-globe eye injuries and proliferative vitreoretinopathy

      2021, Journal of Controlled Release
      Citation Excerpt :

      At present, there is no effective drug formulation or device available to manage the prevention of PVR in open globe trauma [33]. Several high-profile therapeutics in sustained release system have been experimentally evaluated in animal models with some success [26,30,34], however, the results from clinical trials without a delivery system have been dismal [35–37]. We hypothesize that the poor results from clinical studies may be attributed to a lack of a controlled release [26,38].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2006-163.

    Financial support: Royal Blind Asylum/Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, and Special Trustees of Moorfields Eye Hospital.

    View full text