Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 121, Issue 9, September 2014, Pages 1748-1755
Ophthalmology

Original article
Clinical Characteristics of Reticular Pseudodrusen in the Fellow Eye of Patients with Unilateral Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.015Get rights and content

Purpose

To describe associations between reticular pseudodrusen, individual characteristics, and retinal function.

Participants

We recruited 105 patients (age range, 52–93 years) who had advanced neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in only 1 eye from 3 clinical centers in Europe.

Methods

Minimum follow-up was 12 months. The eye selected for study was the fellow eye without advanced disease. Clinical measures of vision were distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, and results of the Smith-Kettlewell low-luminance acuity test (SKILL). Fundus imaging included color photography, red-free imaging, blue autofluorescence imaging, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography using standardized protocols. These were used to detect progression to neovascular AMD in the study eye during follow-up. All imaging outputs were graded for the presence or absence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) using a multimodal approach. Choroidal thickness was measured at the foveal center and at 2 other equidistant locations from the fovea (1500 μm) nasally and temporally. Metrics on retinal thickness and volume were obtained from the manufacturer-supplied automated segmentation readouts.

Main Outcome Measures

Presence of RPD, distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, SKILL score, choroidal thickness, retinal thickness, and retinal volume.

Results

Reticular pseudodrusen was found in 43 participants (41%) on 1 or more imaging method. The SKILL score was significantly worse in those with reticular drusen (mean score ± standard deviation [SD, 38±12) versus those without (mean score ± SD, 33±9) (P = 0.034). Parafoveal retinal thickness, parafoveal retinal volume, and all of the choroidal thickness parameters measured were significantly lower in those with reticular drusen than in those without. The presence of RPD was associated with development of neovascular AMD when corrected for age and sex (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–28.8; P = 0.042). All participants in whom geographic atrophy developed during follow-up had visible RPD at baseline.

Conclusions

Significant differences in retinal and choroidal anatomic features, visual function, and risk factor profile exist in unilateral neovascular AMD patients with RPD compared with those without; therefore, such patients should be monitored carefully because of the risk of developing bilateral disease.

Section snippets

Methods

The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki on research using human volunteers and was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committees of each of the participating institutions. The protocol was explained in full to all subjects and written informed consent was obtained.

Results

Participants (n = 105) were between 52 and 93 years of age (mean, 75.6 years; standard deviation [SD], 7.5 years; Table 1). Reticular pseudodrusen was found in 43 participants (41%) on 1 or more imaging method. On color fundus grading, most eyes exhibited at least 1 of the following features: small drusen larger than 63 μm in 81 eyes (76%), hypopigmentation in 60 eyes (57%), and hyperpigmentation in 41 eyes (39%). Between-grader repeatability (κ statistics) for each imaging method was as

Discussion

Motivated by the current interest in the significance of RPD in the context of AMD, this prospective study incorporating multimethod imaging and clinical measures of visual function identified novel associations and confirmed findings from previous studies. The prevalence of RPD (41%) in the present study is in accordance with previous studies indicating an association between this drusen phenotype and the development of late AMD manifestations. Our findings indicate a slightly higher

References (26)

  • S.Y. Cohen et al.

    Prevalence of reticular pseudodrusen in age-related macular degeneration with newly diagnosed choroidal neovascularisation

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2007)
  • N. Ueda-Arakawa et al.

    Prevalence and genomic association of reticular pseudodrusen in age-related macular degeneration

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2013)
  • R.T. Smith et al.

    Complement factor H 402H variant and reticular macular disease

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (93)

    • Reticular pseudodrusen: A critical phenotype in age-related macular degeneration

      2022, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the high spatial colocalization of these lesions on NIR with subretinal accumulations on OCT imaging (Querques et al., 2011; Schmitz-Valckenberg et al., 2010; Spaide, 2014), we and others have previously defined RPD as being present when corroborating evidence is detected on these two imaging modalities simultaneously (Boddu et al., 2014; Cleland et al., 2020; Finger et al., 2014b; Puche et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2015, 2016a). RPD defined on OCT imaging based on the presence of discrete lesions with sharp peaks – likely corresponding to “dot SDDs” only – were detected by NIR imaging in 88% eyes in one previous study, although at a specificity of 83% (Hogg et al., 2014). A more recent study of eyes with AMD also observed that 83% of eyes with “dot SDDs” on OCT imaging were detected with NIR imaging with a specificity of 91%, whilst only 10% of eyes with “ribbon SDDs” were detected with NIR imaging with a specificity of 100% (Cozzi et al., 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supplemental material is available at www.aaojournal.org.

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s):

    Usha Chakravarthy - Financial support - Pfizer, Inc.

    G. Staurenghi: Consultant—Heidelberg Engineering, Zeiss Meditec; Lecturer—Novartis, Allergan, Zeiss, Alcon; Financial support—Novartis.

    Supported by an educational grant from Pfizer, Inc., New York, New York (grant no.: A9011051 [U.C., R.S., G.S.]).

    R. Silva: Grant support—Pfizer (during the conduct of the study); Novartis, Bayer; Personal fees—Bayer, Allergan, Alcon, and THEA (outside the submitted work); Lecturer—Bayer; Member of Advisory Board: Novartis, Bayer, Allergan, Alcon, THEA.

    View full text