Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 125, Issue 4, April 2018, Pages 529-536
Ophthalmology

Original article
Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.026Get rights and content

Purpose

To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) Study.

Design

Population-based, cross-sectional study.

Participants

Persons of Malay, Indian, and Chinese ethnicity aged 40+ years, living in Singapore.

Methods

Diabetes was defined as nonfasting plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >6.5%, self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, or the use of glucose-lowering medication. Retinal photographs, were graded for the presence and severity of DR using the modified Airlie House classification system.

Main Outcome Measures

Diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema (DME), vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), defined as the presence of severe nonproliferative or proliferative DR, or clinically significant macular edema (CSME).

Results

Of the 10 033 subjects, 2877 (28.7%) had diabetes and gradable photographs for analysis. The overall age-standardized prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 28.2% (25.9–30.6) for any DR, 7.6% (6.5–9.0) for DME, and 7.7% (6.6–9.0) for VTDR. Indians had a higher prevalence of any DR (30.7% vs. 26.2% in Chinese and 25.5% in Malays, P = 0.012); a similar trend was noted for any DME (P = 0.001) and CSME (P = 0.032). Independent risk factors for any DR were Indian ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09–1.83, vs. Chinese), diabetes duration (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08–1.11, per year), HbA1c (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18–1.32, per %), serum glucose (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.06, per mmol/l), and systolic blood pressure (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09–1.19, per 10 mmHg). Diastolic blood pressure (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65–0.84, per 10 mmHg increase), total cholesterol (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80–0.95, per mmol/l increase), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74–0.92, per mmol/l increase) were associated with lower odds of any DR. Risk factors were largely similar across the 3 ethnic groups.

Conclusions

Indian Singaporeans have a higher prevalence of DR and DME compared with Chinese and Malays. Major risk factors for DR in this study were similar across the 3 ethnic groups. Addressing these risk factors may reduce the impact of DR in Asia, regardless of ethnicity.

Section snippets

Study Design and Population

The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED, 2004–2011) Study is a population-based study that included 3 major ethnic groups in Singapore: Malays (2004–2006), Indians (2007–2009), and Chinese (2009–2011).16, 17 The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethics approval was obtained from the Singapore Eye Research Institute Institutional Review Board. On the basis of an age-stratified random sampling strategy, 5000 Malays, 6350 Indians, and 6752 Chinese names were selected. Of

Results

Of the total of 10 033 persons who participated in SEED, 2964 had diabetes. After excluding those with ungradable photographs (n = 87, 2.9%), 2877 persons with diabetes (1008 Malays, 1288 Indians, 581 Chinese) were included for the final analysis. Of these, 51 (1.7%) had type 1 diabetes and the rest had type 2 diabetes.

The age-standardized prevalence was 28.2% (95% CI, 25.9–30.6) for any DR, 7.6 (95% CI, 6.5–9.0) for any DME, 7.7% (95% CI, 6.6–9.0) for VTDR, and 6.4% (95% CI, 5.4–7.6) for CSME.

Discussion

In this study of a multi-ethnic Asian population aged 40 to 80+ years with diabetes, we showed that 1 in 3 had DR, and 1 in 10 had vision-threatening levels of DR. The lower prevalence of diabetes in Chinese is consistent with the findings of 2 previous studies. The Singapore National Health Survey found that the prevalence of diabetes in adults aged 18 to 69 years was 15.3% in Indians, 11.0% in Malays, and 7.1% in Chinese.23 Likewise, in the Singapore Prospective Study Program, among an older

References (39)

  • J.C. Chan et al.

    Diabetes in Asia: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • Y. Xu et al.

    Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • C. Sabanayagam et al.

    Ten emerging trends in the epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy

    Ophthalmic Epidemiol

    (2016)
  • J.W. Yau et al.

    Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy

    Diabetes Care

    (2012)
  • N.T. Raymond et al.

    Higher prevalence of retinopathy in diabetic patients of South Asian ethnicity compared with white Europeans in the community: a cross-sectional study

    Diabetes Care

    (2009)
  • T.Y. Wong et al.

    Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2006)
  • R. Varma et al.

    Prevalence of and risk factors for diabetic macular edema in the United States

    JAMA Ophthalmol

    (2014)
  • M.I. Harris et al.

    Is the risk of diabetic retinopathy greater in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites with type 2 diabetes? A U.S. population study

    Diabetes Care

    (1998)
  • J.K. Bower et al.

    No ethnic differences in the association of glycated hemoglobin with retinopathy: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008

    Diabetes Care

    (2013)
  • Cited by (95)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

    Funded by the National Medical Research Council (grants 0796/2003, IRG07nov013, IRG09nov014, STaR/0003/2008; CG/SERI/2010) and Biomedical Research Council (grants 08/1/35/19/550, 09/1/35/19/616), Singapore. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

    HUMAN SUBJECTS: Study protocol was approved by IRB/ethics committee of the Singapore Eye Research Institute Institutional Review Board. All studies adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

    Author Contributions:

    Conception and design: Tan, Gan, Sabanayagam, Mitchell, Wang, Lamoureux, Cheng, Wong

    Data collection: Tan, Gan, Sabanayagam, Tham, Neelam, Mitchell, Cheng

    Analysis and interpretation: Tan, Gan, Sabanayagam, Tham, Cheng, Wong

    Overall responsibility: Tan, Gan, Sabanayagam, Tham, Neelam, Mitchell, Wang, Lamoureux, Cheng, Wong

    View full text