Skip to main content
Log in

Retinal detachment in Chinese, Malay and Indian residents in Singapore: A comparative study on risk factors, clinical presentation and surgical outcomes

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors, clinical presentation and surgical outcomes of retinal detachment (RD) among Chinese, Malay and Indian residents in Singapore.Methods: A retrospective descriptive study from January 1995 to December 1998. All RD operations performed at a tertiary ophthalmic center in Singapore were initially identified from a computerized audit database. Case records data of all Malay and Indian patients as well as a 10% randomized sample of Chinese patients were retrieved and analyzed. Tractional and exudative RD's were excluded.Results: Of the Singapore residents who had a RD operation over the 4-year period, 597 (89.6%) were Chinese, 47 (7.1%) were Malays and 22 (3.3%) were Indians. The age (mean:46.1 ± 15.5 years), gender distribution (70.5% males) and presenting visual acuities were similar in the 3 races. The most common site of the retinal break(s) was the superotemporal retina (44.9%), followed by the inferotemporal retina (15.3%). Chinese patients were more likely to have multiple or indeterminate breaks (p=0.09) and macula-on RD (p=0.04), compared to Malays and Indians. The distribution of known risk factors (myopia, lattice degeneration, prior cataract surgery and prior ocular trauma) was similar between the three races. The majority of patients required a scleral buckling operation either in isolation (71.3%), or in combination with vitrectomy (19.4%), and only 10 (7.8%) had vitrectomies without buckles. At 6 months postoperatively, anatomical success (defined as an attached retina on ocular examination) and functional success (defined as visual acuities of 6/60 or better) were achieved in 108 (94.7%) and 62 patients (54.4%), respectively, with no significant racial variation seen. The overall rate of redetachment after the initial operation was low (9.3%).Conclusion: Variation in risk factors, clinical presentations and postoperative outcomes of retinal detachment appears to be minimal among Chinese, Malays and Indians in Singapore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. Risk factors for idiopathic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 749-57.

  2. Rowe JA, Erie JC, Baratz KH, Hodge DO, Gray DT, Butterfield L, Robertson DM. Retinal detachment in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 through 1995. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 154-9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK. Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100: 289-92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkes SR, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Robertson DM, OFallon WM. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 670-3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tronquist R, Stenkula S, Tornquist P. Retinal Detachment. A study of a population-based patient material in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1987; 65: 213-22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laatikainen L, Tolppanen EM, Harju H. Epidemiology of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in a Finnish Population. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1985; 63: 59-64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sasaki K, Ideta H, Yonemoto J, Tanaka S, Hirose A, Oka C. Epidemiologic characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Japan. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995; 233: 772-6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wong TY, Tielsch JM, Schein OD. Racial difference in the incidence of retinal detachment in Singapore. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 177: 379-83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Av Shalom A, Berson D, Gombos GM, et al. Some comments on the incidence of idiopathic retinal detachment among Africans. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 64: 384.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown PR, Thomas RP. The low incidence of primary retinal detachment in the Negro. Am J Ophthalmol Soc 1965; 60: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Au Eong KG, Ng CY, Lim MK. Race, Culture and Myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males. Singapore Med J 1993; 34: 29-32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith PW, Stark WJ, Maumenee AE, Enger CL, Michels RG, Glaser BM, Bonham RD. Retinal detachment after extracapsular extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 495-504.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coonan P, Fung WE, Webster RG, Allen AW, Abbott RJ. The incidence of retinal detachment following extracapsular cataract extraction. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 1096-101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen NE, Naaeser K. Epidemiology of retinal detachment following ECCE: a follow-up study with analysis of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 675-80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norregaard JC, Thoning H, Anderson TF, Bernth Peterson P, Javitt JC. Risk of retinal detachment following cataract extraction: results from the Cataract Surgery Outcomes.

  16. Assaf AA. Traumatic retinal detachment. J Trauma 1985; 25: 1085-9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burton TC. The influence of refractive error and lattice degeneration on the incidence of retinal detachment. Tr Am Ophthalmol Soc 1989; 87: 143-57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosman, M., Yin Wong, T., Guan Ong, S. et al. Retinal detachment in Chinese, Malay and Indian residents in Singapore: A comparative study on risk factors, clinical presentation and surgical outcomes. Int Ophthalmol 24, 101–106 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016306609978

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016306609978

Keywords

Navigation