Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Cataract Patients: The Relationship between utility and Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between health-related quality of life (HQL) measures and patient preference for their health status was studied. Study subjects consisted of 132 patients at four hospitals who were scheduled for cataract surgery. Generic and disease-specific health status measures were determined in study subjects. The Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 36 (SF-36) item health status instrument was used to measure generic health status and the Visual Function 14 (VF-14) item visual health status instrument was used as the disease-specific health measure. Preference for general health and visual health was measured by assessing utilities assigned by patients to certain health states. Utilities assigned for general health were correlated with all categories of the SF-36 and VF-14 scores. Utilities assigned for visual health were correlated with four categories of the SF-36 (role limitation due to emotional health, general health, physical functioning, and vitality) and VF-14 scores. Utilities assigned for visual health were more strongly correlated with VF-14 scores than generic measures of health. Verbal ratings for visual health were correlated with Snellen visual acuity (SVA) (r=0.20), utilities assigned for visual health (r=0.58), VF-14 scores (r=0.74), all categories of the SF-36 (r values ranging from 0.21 to 0.28), utilities assigned for general health (r=0.19), and verbal ratings for general health (r=0.29). Utility measures and verbal ratings for general and visual health were shown to be appropriate HQL measures. These measures were strongly correlated with other established generic and disease-specific health measures and should be included in the array of health status measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feeny D, Torrance GW. Incorporating utility based quality of life assessment measures in clinical trials: Two examples. Med Care 1989; 27(Suppl): S190–S204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fletcher AE, Ellwein LB, Selvaraj S, Vikaykumar V, Rahmatullah R, Thulariraj RD. Measurement of vision function and quality of life in patient with cataracts in southern India: Report of instrument development. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115(6): 767–774.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Read JL, Quinn RJ, Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinstein MC. Preferences for health outcomes: Comparison of assessment methods. Medical Decision Making 1984; 4: 315–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett KJ, Torrance GW. Measuring health state preferences and utilities: Rating scale, time trade-of, and standard gamble techniques. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Press, 1996; 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett K, Torrance G, Tugwell P. Methodological challenges in the development of utility measures of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Controlled Clinical Trials 1991; 12: 118S–128S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ware Jr. JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30(6): 473–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinberg EP, Javitt PD, Shjarkey PD, et al. The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 1041–1047.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Furlong WJ. Health utilities index. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmaco-1134 economics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Press, 1996; 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tielsch JM, Steinberg EP, Cassard SD, et al. Preoperative functional expectations and outcomes among patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113(10): 1312–1318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alonzo J, Epsallangues M, Andersen TF, Cassard SD, Dunn E. International applicability of the VF-14: An index of visual function in patients with cataracts. Ophthalmology 1997; 104(5): 799–807.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bass EB, Steinberg EP, Pitt HA, et al. Comparison of the rating scale and standard gamble in measuring patient preferences for outcomes of gallstone disease. Medical Decision Making 1994; 14: 307–314.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greset J, Boisjoly H, Nguyen TQ, et al. Validation of French-language versions of the Visual Functioning Index (VF-14) and the Cataract Symptom Score. Can J Ophthalmol 1997; 32(1): 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences-I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiology 1989; 42(4): 345–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmaco-economics 2000; 17(1): 13–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J., Fos, P., Zuniga, M. et al. Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Cataract Patients: The Relationship between utility and Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement. Qual Life Res 9, 1127–1135 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016645523769

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016645523769

Navigation