Skip to main content
Log in

Prophylaxis of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis with or without combined intraocular antibiotics: a prospective, double-masked randomized pilot study

  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The effectiveness of an intraocular injection of combined gentamicin and clindamycin in the prevention of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis following penetrating ocular injuries was evaluated in a prospective, double-masked, randomized pilot study. Methods: Sixty eyes of 60 patients with penetrating ocular injuries were treated at a tertiary care hospital. Following primary repair, the eyes were randomized in two groups. Group 1, the antibiotic injection group (cases), was given an intracameral or intravitreal injection of 0.1 mL antibiotic (40 μg gentamicin and 45 μg clindamycin). Group 2 (balanced saline solution [BSS] injection group [controls]) received intracameral or intravitreal injection of 0.1 mL BSS. All patients received standard prophylactic antibiotic therapy (systemic, subconjunctival, and topical). Result: Although the overall incidence of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis was 6.6% (4 eyes), the results of three cultures were negative. All endophthalmitis cases occurred in the BSS injection group; however, there was no statistically significant difference between case and control groups (p = 0.11). The incidence rate for those with retained intraocular foreign bodies was 13.3% and for those without foreign bodies was 4.4%. No retinal toxicity was detected. Conclusion: Intraocular injection of gentamicin and clindamycin in addition to the other methods of prophylaxis may be an effective modality in the prevention of posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Early results suggest that these antibiotics may have a role as adjunct therapy to primary repair of injured globes without significant side effects at the dosage used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boldt HC, Pulido JS, Blodi CF, Folk JC, Weingeist TA. Rural endophthalmitis. Ophthalmol 1989; 96: 1722–1726.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson WS, Rubsamen PE, Flynn HW Jr, Schiffman J, Cousins SW. Endophthalmitis after penetrating trauma: Risk factors and visual acuity outcomes. Ophthalmol 1995; 102: 1696–1701.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfaro DV, Runyan T, Kirkman E, Tran VT, Liggett PE. Intravenous cefazolin in penetrating eye injuries: Treatment of experimental posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Retina 1993; 13: 331–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study: A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1479–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foster RE, Martinez JA, Murray TG, Rubsamen PE, Flynn HW, Forster RK. Useful visual outcomes after treatment of Bacillus cereus endophthalmitis. Ophthalmol 1996; 103: 390–397.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mieler WF, Ellis MK, Williams DF, Han DP. Retained intraocular foreign bodies and endophthalmitis. Ophthalmol 1990; 97: 1532–1538.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hogan MJ, Kimura SJ, Thygeson P. Signs and symptoms of uveitis I. Anterior uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1959; 47: 155–170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duch-Samper AM, Menezo JL, Hurtado-Sarrio M. Endophthalmitis following penetrating eye injuries. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997; 75: 104–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peyman GA. Antibiotic administration in the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis. II. Intravitreal injections. Surv Ophthalmol 1977; 21: 332, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bohigian GM, Olk RJ. Factors associated with a poor visual result in endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 101: 332–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alfaro DV, Liggett PE. Intravenous cefazolin in penetrating eye injuries. I. Effects of trauma and multiple doses on intraocular delivery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994; 232: 236–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joosse MV, Van Tilburg CJ, Mertens DA, Peperkamp E, Van Meurs JC, Ringens PJ, Jager GV, Beekhuis WH. Endophthalmitis: Incidence, therapy and visual outcome in the period 1983; 1992 in the Rotterdam Eye Hospital. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 82: 115–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barza M, Kane A, Baum J. Intraocular penetration of gentamicin after subconjunctival and retrobulbar injection. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 85: 541–547.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Campochiaro PA, Conway BP. Aminoglycoside toxicity-a survey of retinal specialists: Implications for ocular use. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 946–950.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Campochiaro PA, Lim JL, the Aminoglycoside Toxicity Study Group. Aminoglycoside toxicity in the treatment of endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112: 48–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jonas JB, Knorr HLJ, Budde WM. Prognostic factors in ocular injuries caused by intraocular or retrobulbar foreign bodies. Ophthalmol 2000; 107: 823–828.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soheilian, M., Rafati, N. & Peyman, G.A. Prophylaxis of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis with or without combined intraocular antibiotics: a prospective, double-masked randomized pilot study. Int Ophthalmol 24, 323–330 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INTE.0000006768.66170.c1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INTE.0000006768.66170.c1

Navigation