Purpose: To study the ability to appreciate qualitative features that indicate disease activity in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to analyze the differences in automated retinal thickness measurement, using 1 time domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) and 2 different spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) machines. Methods: Thirty-three consecutive naïve patients with neovascular AMD underwent Stratus TD-OCT, Cirrus SD-OCT and Spectralis SD-OCT, at baseline, 1 h, 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after intravitreal ranibizumab injection. Results: As regards the ability to detect retinal cysts, subretinal fluid and pigment epithelium detachment, at each follow-up visit, there was a significant correlation among all 3 OCT devices (p < 0.05), even though Cirrus SD-OCT and Spectralis SD-OCT showed the highest level of intermachine agreement. At each follow-up visit, automated retinal thickness measurements showed a greater mean central macular thickness (CMT) for both Spectralis SD-OCT and Cirrus SD-OCT, compared with Stratus TD-OCT. However, the mean paired differences in CMT among the 3 OCT devices were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Overall, Cirrus SD-CT showed fewer segmentation errors, compared with both Spectralis SD-OCT and Stratus TD-OCT. Conclusion: SD-OCT showed a greater ability to evaluate qualitative features indicating disease activity and fewer errors in automated segmentation. However, differences in CMT changes were similar between TD-OCT and SD-OCT systems during follow-up.

Keywords:
Age-related macular degeneration, Optical coherence tomography, Ranibizumab, Spectral domain, Time domain, Vascular endothelial growth factor
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.