Scotopic measurement of normal pupils: Colvard versus Video Vision Analyzer infrared pupillometer

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Jun;26(6):859-66. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00486-7.

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively measure the scotopic pupil diameter in a normal population and to compare 2 infrared pupillometers for these measurements.

Setting: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Department of Ophthalmology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Methods: The Colvard infrared pupillometer was compared to the Video Vision Analyzer (VIVA) infrared pupillometer under scotopic light conditions in 33 participants (aged 19 to 55 years). Reliability was assessed by 2 independent examiners (E1, E2). Statistical analysis was performed using a comparison method by Bland and Altman.

Results: Mean pupil diameter was 6.16 mm +/- 1.20 (SD) (range 3.20 to 9.00 mm) with all measurements taken under scotopic illumination. The mean scotopic pupil diameter was 6.08 +/- 1.16 mm (range 3.2 to 8.4 mm) with the Colvard pupillometer and 6.24 +/- 1.28 mm (3.5 to 9.0 mm) with the VIVA pupillometer. The mean differences between the Colvard and VIVA were -0.27 mm (E1) and -0.05 mm (E2). Limits of agreement ranged from 1.4 (Colvard) to 2.4 (VIVA). The coefficients of repeatability ranged from 0.7 (Colvard) to 1.1 (VIVA).

Conclusions: A mean scotopic pupil diameter of 6.15 mm with a maximal pupil size of 9.00 mm can be expected in a normal population; this should be considered in refractive corneal and refractive lens surgery. Measurements with the Colvard pupillometer were more reliable and precise than those with the VIVA pupillometer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aging / physiology
  • Dark Adaptation / physiology*
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological / instrumentation*
  • Equipment Design
  • Eye Color
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infrared Rays*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pupil / physiology*
  • Reference Values
  • Video Recording*