Systemic vascular safety of ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2193-203.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 Jul 12.

Abstract

Background: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials of ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to elucidate systemic vascular risk.

Clinical relevance: Although intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors are widely used to treat AMD, whether they produce systemic adverse effects remains uncertain.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through March 2014 to identify the randomized trials that compared systemic safety among different intensities of ranibizumab treatment for AMD. The outcome measures were the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), myocardial infarctions, nonocular hemorrhages, overall arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs), and all-cause mortality. We calculated the Peto odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval for the comparisons between different intensities of regimens in terms of dose and retreatment frequency.

Results: Eleven trials comprising 6596 patients with AMD were included in the meta-analysis. A significant increase was observed in the following comparisons: 0.5 versus 0.3/0.0 mg for CVA (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05-3.29; P = 0.03), monthly versus pro re nata (PRN)/0.0 mg for CVA (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.06-3.38; P = 0.03), and 0.3/0.5 versus 0.0 mg for nonocular hemorrhage (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.44; P = 0.04). A nonsignificant increase was observed in the following comparisons: 0.5 versus 0.0 mg for CVA (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 0.90-5.69; P = 0.08), monthly versus PRN for CVA (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.94-4.45; P = 0.07), 0.5 versus 0.0 mg for nonocular hemorrhage (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.98-2.88; P = 0.06), 0.3 versus 0.0 mg for nonocular hemorrhage (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.95-2.98; P = 0.07), monthly versus PRN/0.0 mg for nonocular hemorrhage (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.98-2.42; P = 0.06), monthly versus PRN for ATE (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.96-2.61; P = 0.07), and monthly versus PRN/0.0 mg for ATE (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.99-2.05; P = 0.06). Among the other analyses, no protective or harmful effects of ranibizumab were observed.

Conclusions: In ranibizumab treatment for patients with AMD, a possible relationship of more intensive treatment to more systemic vascular adverse events was identified, but no relationship with mortality was identified.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors / adverse effects*
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / adverse effects*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use
  • Databases, Factual
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced*
  • Hemorrhage / diagnosis
  • Hemorrhage / mortality
  • Humans
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Macular Degeneration / drug therapy*
  • Myocardial Infarction / chemically induced*
  • Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis
  • Myocardial Infarction / mortality
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Ranibizumab
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke / chemically induced*
  • Stroke / diagnosis
  • Stroke / mortality
  • Thromboembolism / chemically induced*
  • Thromboembolism / diagnosis
  • Thromboembolism / mortality
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A / antagonists & inhibitors

Substances

  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
  • Ranibizumab